A New Method of Accurate Pedicle Screw Navigation

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2025 Mar 13

PMID 40075159

Authors

Daniel Suter

Aidana Massalimova

Christoph Johannes Laux

Laura Leoty

Jose Miguel Spirig

Florentin Liebmann

Fabio Carrillo

Philipp Furnstahl

Mazda Farshad

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

One of the most established approaches to navigate pedicle screws is the planning and alignment (PA) method. Thereby a trajectory and associated entry point (EP) is planned and navigated after referencing to patient anatomy. However, deviations from the planned EP potentially lead to an altered screw position. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of these EP deviations and to examine possible alternative methods. The merits of two new points of reference (screw tip point STP and midpoint MP) were therefore analyzed. STP represents the point on the optimal screw tip, MP the point at the center/midportion of the pedicle at its narrowest portion. The adapted screw trajectory was defined as the directional vector from any chosen EP to the STP or MP. First, computer simulations were used to evaluate the performance of these new approaches. Subsequently, the navigation technique yielding more acceptable screws in case of an EP deviation was analyzed on phantom-sawbone models. Both new methods showed a significantly larger number of possible screw trajectories in the simulations (p < 0.01). Even with a deliberate deviation of 4.5 mm (IQR 3.3) from the optimal EP, a perforation-free screw diameter of 4.9 mm (IQR 5.7 mm) could be achieved using the new navigation techniques. The simulated perforations were mainly located laterally with a median of 8.45 mm (IQR 3.95) distance to the medial pedicle wall. The PA method seems to be susceptible to EP deviations. The STP and MP methods are possible improvement mechanisms to overcome this disadvantage.

References

Elmi-Terander A, Burstrom G, Nachabe R, Skulason H, Pedersen K, Fagerlund M . Pedicle Screw Placement Using Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation With Intraoperative 3D Imaging: A First In-Human Prospective Cohort Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 44(7):517-525. PMC: 6426349. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002876. View

Laudato P, Pierzchala K, Schizas C . Pedicle Screw Insertion Accuracy Using O-Arm, Robotic Guidance, or Freehand Technique: A Comparative Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017; 43(6):E373-E378. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002449. View

Saarenpaa I, Laine T, Hirvonen J, Hurme S, Kotilainen E, Rinne J . Accuracy of 837 pedicle screw positions in degenerative lumbar spine with conventional open surgery evaluated by computed tomography. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017; 159(10):2011-2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-017-3289-7. View

Matsukawa K, Kato T, Yato Y, Sasao H, Imabayashi H, Hosogane N . Incidence and Risk Factors of Adjacent Cranial Facet Joint Violation Following Pedicle Screw Insertion Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41(14):E851-E856. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001459. View

Shin B, James A, Njoku I, Hartl R . Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012; 17(2):113-22. DOI: 10.3171/2012.5.SPINE11399. View

Yanni D, Ozgur B, Louis R, Shekhtman Y, Iyer R, Boddapati V . Real-time navigation guidance with intraoperative CT imaging for pedicle screw placement using an augmented reality head-mounted display: a proof-of-concept study. Neurosurg Focus. 2021; 51(2):E11. DOI: 10.3171/2021.5.FOCUS21209. View

Frisk H, Lindqvist E, Persson O, Weinzierl J, Bruetzel L, Cewe P . Feasibility and Accuracy of Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head Mounted Device. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(2). PMC: 8779462. DOI: 10.3390/s22020522. View

Castro W, Halm H, Jerosch J, Malms J, Steinbeck J, Blasius S . Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(11):1320-4. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199606010-00008. View

Korkmaz M, Sariyilmaz K, Ozkunt O, Can Gemalmaz H, Akgul T, Sungur M . Quantitative comparison of a laterally misplaced pedicle screw with a re-directed screw. How much pull-out strength is lost?. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018; 52(6):459-463. PMC: 6318573. DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.03.002. View

10.

Liebmann F, Roner S, von Atzigen M, Scaramuzza D, Sutter R, Snedeker J . Pedicle screw navigation using surface digitization on the Microsoft HoloLens. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019; 14(7):1157-1165. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-019-01973-7. View

11.

Belmont Jr P, Klemme W, Robinson M, Polly Jr D . Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws in patients with and without coronal plane spinal deformities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(14):1558-66. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200207150-00015. View

12.

Yahanda A, Moore E, Ray W, Pennicooke B, Jennings J, Molina C . First in-human report of the clinical accuracy of thoracolumbar percutaneous pedicle screw placement using augmented reality guidance. Neurosurg Focus. 2021; 51(2):E10. DOI: 10.3171/2021.5.FOCUS21217. View

13.

Gertzbein S, Robbins S . Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990; 15(1):11-4. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199001000-00004. View

14.

Amato V, Giannachi L, Irace C, Corona C . Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the lumbosacral spine using conventional technique: computed tomography postoperative assessment in 102 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010; 12(3):306-13. DOI: 10.3171/2009.9.SPINE09261. View

15.

Farshad M, Spirig J, Suter D, Hoch A, Burkhard M, Liebmann F . Operator independent reliability of direct augmented reality navigated pedicle screw placement and rod bending. N Am Spine Soc J. 2022; 8:100084. PMC: 8819958. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100084. View

16.

Amaral R, Pimenta L, Netto A, Pokorny G, Fernandes R . Pedicle Screws and Facet Violation - The importance of the Angle between the Facet and the Screw. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2020; 55(5):642-648. PMC: 7575402. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709200. View

17.

Caprara S, Fasser M, Spirig J, Widmer J, Snedeker J, Farshad M . Bone density optimized pedicle screw instrumentation improves screw pull-out force in lumbar vertebrae. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2021; 25(4):464-474. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1959558. View

18.

Peh S, Chatterjea A, Pfarr J, Schafer J, Weuster M, Kluter T . Accuracy of augmented reality surgical navigation for minimally invasive pedicle screw insertion in the thoracic and lumbar spine with a new tracking device. Spine J. 2019; 20(4):629-637. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.12.009. View

19.

Siemionow K, Katchko K, Lewicki P, Luciano C . Augmented reality and artificial intelligence-assisted surgical navigation: Technique and cadaveric feasibility study. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2020; 11(2):81-85. PMC: 7462141. DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_48_20. View

20.

Liu A, Jin Y, Cottrill E, Khan M, Westbroek E, Ehresman J . Clinical accuracy and initial experience with augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw placement: the first 205 screws. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021; 36(3):351-357. DOI: 10.3171/2021.2.SPINE202097. View