Computed Tomography Evaluation of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws Inserted During Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Long-term Follow-up Results of Screw Violation

Overview

Journal Clin Orthop Surg

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2023 Feb 13

PMID 36778999

Authors

Jae Chul Lee

Hae-Dong Jang

Sung-Woo Choi

Byung-Joon Shin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) insertion in degenerative lumbar disease treated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) and to analyze risk factors and long-term clinical outcomes of screw violation.

Methods: Sixty-two consecutive patients (262 screws) were included. Based on postoperative computed tomography (CT) axial images, a PPS that perforated out of the pedicle was classified into a violation group, while screws surrounded by pedicular cortical bone were classified into a correct group. A logistic regression model was used for risk factor analysis of violation. We also observed the long-term clinical outcomes using the Oswestry disability index and visual analog scale.

Results: Of the 262 screws, 14 (5.3%) were considered to be violated (10 medial violations and 4 lateral violations). All violations of S1 and L5 were in the medial direction. In contrast, entire violations of L4 were always lateral and of the 2 violations of L3, one was lateral and the other was medial. There were no cases of superior or inferior violation. The mean pedicle convergence angle (CA) was significantly higher in the violation group (mean ± standard deviation, 27.0° ± 6.2°) than in the correct group (21.7° ± 5.4°). There were no significant differences according to vertebral rotational angle, body mass index, bone mineral density, and surgical timing (learning curve) between the two groups. Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that a high CA was a significant risk factor for pedicle wall violation ( = 0.002). There were no significant differences in clinical or radiographic results between the two groups in 60 patients who were followed up for more than 1 year and in 40 patients who were followed up for more than 5 years. There were 2 patients who required reoperation to replace a screw due to leg pain.

Conclusions: With PPS insertion during MI-TLIF, the rate of pedicle violation was 5.3% (14/262). An understanding of the anatomical characteristics of each vertebra and the unique structures of the patient is essential to prevent pedicle violations. Even in the violation group, PPS fixation was found to be a safe and useful procedure with successful long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes.

References

Foley K, Gupta S . Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. J Neurosurg. 2002; 97(1 Suppl):7-12. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2002.97.1.0007. View

Oh H, Seo H . Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in Thoracolumbar Fractures: Comparison of Results According to Implant Removal Time. Clin Orthop Surg. 2019; 11(3):291-296. PMC: 6695328. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.3.291. View

Bindal R, Ghosh S . Intraoperative electromyography monitoring in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007; 6(2):126-32. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.2.126. View

Abul-Kasim K, Strombeck A, Ohlin A, Maly P, Sundgren P . Reliability of low-radiation dose CT in the assessment of screw placement after posterior scoliosis surgery, evaluated with a new grading system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(9):941-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819b22a4. View

FARBER G, Place H, Mazur R, Jones D, Damiano T . Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusions by plain radiographs and computed tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20(13):1494-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199507000-00010. View

Oh H, Kim J, Lee S, Liu W, Hong S . Comparison between the accuracy of percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixations in lumbosacral fusion. Spine J. 2013; 13(12):1751-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.042. View

Silva P, Pereira P, Monteiro P, Silva P, Vaz R . Learning curve and complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus. 2013; 35(2):E7. DOI: 10.3171/2013.5.FOCUS13157. View

Kim M, Chung H, Cho J, Kim D, Chung N . Factors affecting the accurate placement of percutaneous pedicle screws during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20(10):1635-43. PMC: 3175862. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1892-5. View

Schwender J, Holly L, Rouben D, Foley K . Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005; 18 Suppl:S1-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000132291.50455.d0. View

10.

Park D, Thomas A, St Clair S, Bawa M . Percutaneous lumbar and thoracic pedicle screws: a trauma experience. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012; 27(3):154-61. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318250ec75. View

11.

Bridwell K, Lenke L, McEnery K, Baldus C, Blanke K . Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20(12):1410-8. View

12.

Kim Y, Ha K, Rhyu K, Park H, Cho C, Kim H . Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Techniques, Pearls and Pitfalls. Asian Spine J. 2020; 14(5):730-741. PMC: 7595814. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2020.0485. View

13.

Park Y, Ha J, Lee Y, Sung N . Percutaneous placement of pedicle screws in overweight and obese patients. Spine J. 2011; 11(10):919-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.07.029. View

14.

Wiesner L, Kothe R, Schulitz K, Ruther W . Clinical evaluation and computed tomography scan analysis of screw tracts after percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(5):615-21. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200003010-00013. View

15.

Powers C, Podichetty V, Isaacs R . Placement of percutaneous pedicle screws without imaging guidance. Neurosurg Focus. 2006; 20(3):E3. DOI: 10.3171/foc.2006.20.3.4. View

16.

Heintel T, Berglehner A, Meffert R . Accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screws for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: a prospective trial. Eur Spine J. 2012; 22(3):495-502. PMC: 3585653. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2476-8. View

17.

Rampersaud Y, Pik J, Salonen D, Farooq S . Clinical accuracy of fluoroscopic computer-assisted pedicle screw fixation: a CT analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(7):E183-90. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000157490.65706.38. View

18.

Lieberman I, Hardenbrook M, Wang J, Guyer R . Assessment of pedicle screw placement accuracy, procedure time, and radiation exposure using a miniature robotic guidance system. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011; 25(5):241-8. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318218a5ef. View

19.

Kumar A, Merrill R, Overley S, Leven D, Meaike J, Vaishnav A . Radiation Exposure in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Effect of the Learning Curve. Int J Spine Surg. 2019; 13(1):39-45. PMC: 6383465. DOI: 10.14444/6006. View

20.

Castro W, Halm H, Jerosch J, Malms J, Steinbeck J, Blasius S . Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(11):1320-4. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199606010-00008. View