Autonomous Establishment of CT-Independent Sections to Obtain Optimum Pedicle-Screw Axis in Direction, Length, and Safety Margin

Overview

Journal Int J Med Robot

Publisher Wiley

Specialties Biotechnology
General Surgery

Date 2025 Mar 3

PMID 40025863

Authors

Amit Kumar

Dwarakanath T A

Gaurav Bhutani

Dwarakanath Srinivas

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Accurate perception of pedicle geometry during pedicle-screw placement surgery is critically important because the margin-for-error is small.

Method: An assessment algorithm is developed to provide machine-independent MultiPlanar Reconstruction (MiMPR) of the pedicle. The reconstruction is independent of the CT-machine frame and enhances patient data portability. Additionally, the algorithm obtains the pedicle-screw axis with optimum direction, length, and margin using MPRs. A method for the autonomous identification of four body features to form a CT-independent vertebral frame, {V}, in the image space is formulated.

Result: Applied to 200 high-resolution CT images, the approach achieved a 100% success rate in defining the pedicle-medial axis and maximum screw diameter considering the safety margin of 2 mm.

Conclusions: The method eliminates subjective assessment. It provides objective assessment in determining the pedicle-medial axis with optimal direction and margin without human annotation. Additionally, it significantly enhances screw placement accuracy in robot-assisted spinal fusion surgeries, regardless of vertebra orientation.

References

Rampersaud Y, Simon D, Foley K . Accuracy requirements for image-guided spinal pedicle screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(4):352-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200102150-00010. View

Daemi N, Ahmadian A, Mirbagheri A, Ahmadian A, Saberi H, Amidi F . Planning screw insertion trajectory in lumbar spinal fusion using pre-operative CT images. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016; 2015:3639-42. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319181. View

Ma C, Zou D, Qi H, Li C, Zhang C, Yang K . A novel surgical planning system using an AI model to optimize planning of pedicle screw trajectories with highest bone mineral density and strongest pull-out force. Neurosurg Focus. 2022; 52(4):E10. DOI: 10.3171/2022.1.FOCUS21721. View

Castro W, Halm H, Jerosch J, Malms J, Steinbeck J, Blasius S . Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(11):1320-4. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199606010-00008. View

Cheng P, Cao X, Yang Y, Zhang G, He Y . Automatically recognize and segment morphological features of the 3D vertebra based on topological data analysis. Comput Biol Med. 2022; 149:106031. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106031. View

Scherer M, Kausch L, Ishak B, Norajitra T, Vollmuth P, Kiening K . Development and validation of an automated planning tool for navigated lumbosacral pedicle screws using a convolutional neural network. Spine J. 2022; 22(10):1666-1676. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.05.002. View

Illingworth J, Kittler J . The adaptive hough transform. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2011; 9(5):690-8. DOI: 10.1109/tpami.1987.4767964. View

Weiser L, Sehmisch S, Lehmann W, Viezens L . [Techniques to increase pedicle screw stability in osteoporotic vertebrae]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2019; 31(4):284-292. DOI: 10.1007/s00064-019-0608-6. View

Santoni B, Hynes R, McGilvray K, Rodriguez-Canessa G, LYONS A, Henson M . Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J. 2008; 9(5):366-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.07.008. View

10.

Krag M, Beynnon B, Pope M, DeCoster T . Depth of insertion of transpedicular vertebral screws into human vertebrae: effect upon screw-vertebra interface strength. J Spinal Disord. 1988; 1(4):287-94. DOI: 10.1097/00002517-198800140-00002. View

11.

Matsukawa K, Taguchi E, Yato Y, Imabayashi H, Hosogane N, Asazuma T . Evaluation of the Fixation Strength of Pedicle Screws Using Cortical Bone Trajectory: What Is the Ideal Trajectory for Optimal Fixation?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(15):E873-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000983. View

12.

Lee J, Kim S, Kim Y, Chung W . Optimal surgical planning guidance for lumbar spinal fusion considering operational safety and vertebra-screw interface strength. Int J Med Robot. 2012; 8(3):261-72. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1413. View

13.

Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Imabayashi H . Impact of Screw Diameter and Length on Pedicle Screw Fixation Strength in Osteoporotic Vertebrae: A Finite Element Analysis. Asian Spine J. 2020; 15(5):566-574. PMC: 8561163. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2020.0353. View

14.

Siemionow K, Forsthoefel C, Foy M, Gawel D, Luciano C . Autonomous lumbar spine pedicle screw planning using machine learning: A validation study. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2021; 12(3):223-227. PMC: 8501821. DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_94_21. View

15.

Schulze C, Munzinger E, Weber U . Clinical relevance of accuracy of pedicle screw placement. A computed tomographic-supported analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(20):2215-20; discussion 2220-1. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199810150-00014. View

16.

Lee C, Park S, Hwang C, Kim D, Lee W, Kim Y . A novel method of screw placement for extremely small thoracic pedicles in scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(16):E1112-6. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ffeea2. View

17.

Jarvers J, Schleifenbaum S, Pfeifle C, Oefner C, Edel M, von der Hoh N . Comparison of three different screw trajectories in osteoporotic vertebrae: a biomechanical investigation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):418. PMC: 8101169. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04254-0. View

18.

Wang Y, Yang L, Li C, Sun H . The Biomechanical Properties of Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screws for Osteoporotic Spines. Global Spine J. 2021; 12(2):323-332. PMC: 8907649. DOI: 10.1177/2192568220987214. View

19.

Jia S, Weng Y, Wang K, Qi H, Yang Y, Ma C . Performance evaluation of an AI-based preoperative planning software application for automatic selection of pedicle screws based on computed tomography images. Front Surg. 2023; 10:1247527. PMC: 10518392. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1247527. View

20.

Best N, Sasso R, Garrido B . Computer-assisted spinal navigation using a percutaneous dynamic reference frame for posterior fusions of the lumbar spine. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009; 38(8):387-91. View