» Articles » PMID: 7738196

Vertebral Size in Elderly Women with Osteoporosis. Mechanical Implications and Relationship to Fractures

Overview
Journal J Clin Invest
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1995 May 1
PMID 7738196
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reductions in bone density are a major determinant of vertebral fractures in the elderly population. However, women have a greater incidence of fractures than men, although their spinal bone densities are comparable. Recent observations indicate that women have 20-25% smaller vertebrae than men after accounting for differences in body size. To assess whether elderly women with vertebral fractures have smaller vertebrae than women who do not experience fractures, we reviewed 1,061 computed tomography bone density studies and gathered 32-matched pairs of elderly women, with reduced bone density, whose main difference was absence or presence of vertebral fractures. Detailed measurements of the dimensions of unfractured vertebrae and the moment arm of spinal musculature from T12 to L4 were calculated from computed tomography images in the 32 pairs of women matched for race, age, height, weight, and bone density. The cross-sectional area of unfractured vertebrae was 4.9-11.5% (10.5 +/- 1.4 vs 9.7 +/- 1.5 cm2; P < 0.0001) smaller and the moment arm of spinal musculature was 3.2-7.4% (56.4 +/- 5.1 vs 53.1 +/- 4.4 mm; P < 0.0001) shorter in women with fractures, implying that mechanical stress within intact vertebral bodies for equivalent loads is 5-17% greater in women with fractures compared to women without fractures. Such significant variations are very likely to contribute to vertebral fractures in osteoporotic women.

Citing Articles

Vertebral body density role in determining vertebral osteoporotic fracture type and its progression.

Smorgick Y, Pelleg-Kallevag R, Lindner D, Anekstein Y, Goldstein S, May H Clin Anat. 2024; 38(1):97-104.

PMID: 39365902 PMC: 11652797. DOI: 10.1002/ca.24219.


Association between vertebral cross-sectional area and lumbar disc displacement - a population-based study.

Ollila L, Oura P, Karppinen J, Niinimaki J, Junno J Eur Spine J. 2023; 33(3):900-905.

PMID: 37452838 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07853-8.


Sexual Dimorphism and the Origins of Human Spinal Health.

Gilsanz V, Wren T, Ponrartana S, Mora S, Rosen C Endocr Rev. 2018; 39(2):221-239.

PMID: 29385433 PMC: 5888211. DOI: 10.1210/er.2017-00147.


Vertebral cross-sectional area: an orphan phenotype with potential implications for female spinal health.

Wren T, Ponrartana S, Gilsanz V Osteoporos Int. 2016; 28(4):1179-1189.

PMID: 27975301 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3832-z.


Morphometry of the lower lumbar intervertebral discs and endplates: comparative analyses of new MRI data with previous findings.

Tang R, Gungor C, Sesek R, Foreman K, Gallagher S, Davis G Eur Spine J. 2016; 25(12):4116-4131.

PMID: 26873104 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4405-8.


References
1.
Atkinson P . Variation in trabecular structure of vertebrae with age. Calcif Tissue Res. 1967; 1(1):24-32. DOI: 10.1007/BF02008071. View

2.
Kanis J, Melton 3rd L, Christiansen C, JOHNSTON C, Khaltaev N . The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1994; 9(8):1137-41. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650090802. View

3.
LINDAHL O . Mechanical properties of dried defatted spongy bone. Acta Orthop Scand. 1976; 47(1):11-9. DOI: 10.3109/17453677608998966. View

4.
Schultz A, Andersson G . Analysis of loads on the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981; 6(1):76-82. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198101000-00017. View

5.
. Osteoporosis. Part I. Advanced radiologic assessment using quantitative computed tomography. West J Med. 1983; 139(1):75-84. PMC: 1010880. View