» Articles » PMID: 2035348

Classification of Vertebral Fractures

Overview
Date 1991 Mar 1
PMID 2035348
Citations 146
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although it is a cardinal feature of involutional osteoporosis, there is often disagreement on what constitutes a vertebral fracture. We measured vertebrae T4-L5 in 52 healthy women to develop a normal range (mean +/- 3 SD) for vertebral shape and used these data to assess the prevalence of vertebral fractures. We classified vertebral fractures by type of deformity (wedge, biconcavity, or compression) and further by the degree of deformity (grades 1 and 2). In 195 postmenopausal women who were an age-stratified random sample of the Rochester population (ages 47-94), 40 (21%) had vertebral fractures (mean, 2 per person). There was a similar number of compression and wedge fractures, and grade 2 fractures were as common as grade 1. In a referral sample of 74 women with suspected osteoporosis, 62 (84%) had vertebral fractures (mean, 3.3 per person). Wedge fractures were most common, and grade 2 fractures were more common than grade 1. The distribution of type and grade of fractures differed between the two patient groups (P less than 0.01). Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine was related to mean fracture grade (r = -0.33, P less than 0.05) and to fracture number (r = -0.57, P less than 0.001) but not to fracture type. We conclude that a comprehensive approach is required in describing vertebral fractures. Using this approach we found distortion in the fracture characteristics of women referred to an osteoporosis clinic compared to women in the community.

Citing Articles

Immune cell profiles and predictive modeling in osteoporotic vertebral fractures using XGBoost machine learning algorithms.

Chen Y, Su H, Huang S, Yu C, Chang J, Chiu Y BioData Min. 2025; 18(1):13.

PMID: 39905521 PMC: 11792337. DOI: 10.1186/s13040-025-00427-y.


Normative vertebral deformity measurements in a clinically relevant population using magnetic resonance imaging.

Sorci O, Madi R, Kim S, Batzdorf A, Alecxih A, Hornyak J World J Radiol. 2025; 16(12):749-759.

PMID: 39801667 PMC: 11718528. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i12.749.


The relationship between treatment-related changes in total hip BMD measured after 12, 18, and 24 mo and fracture risk reduction in osteoporosis clinical trials: the FNIH-ASBMR-SABRE project.

Vilaca T, Schini M, Lui L, Ewing S, Thompson A, Vittinghoff E J Bone Miner Res. 2024; 39(10):1434-1442.

PMID: 39127916 PMC: 11425700. DOI: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae126.


Rehabilitation of a Patient With D12 Wedge Compression Fracture and Bilateral Foot Drop With Spinal Fusion and Posterior Decompression: A Case Report.

Bhoge S, Athawale V, Fating T Cureus. 2024; 16(1):e51561.

PMID: 38313983 PMC: 10835512. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51561.


Validation of a preoperative formula to estimate postoperative pelvic sagittal alignment and mobility before performing total hip arthroplasty for patients with hip osteoarthritis.

Tanabe H, Homma Y, Yanagisawa N, Watari T, Ishii S, Shirogane Y Arthroplasty. 2023; 5(1):13.

PMID: 37020254 PMC: 10077599. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-023-00171-w.