Influence of Anatomical Variations on Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Pathogenesis

Overview

Journal Eur Spine J

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2014 Aug 30

PMID 25169143

Citations 3

Authors

Sophie Merckaert

Katarzyna Pierzchala

Gerit Kulik

Constantin Schizas

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Symptomatic foraminal stenosis has been observed in patients with degenerative disc disease, scoliosis, asymmetrical disc degeneration and spondylolisthesis. Nevertheless not all patients with the above pathologies will develop symptomatic foraminal stenosis. We hypothesised that symptomatic patients have anatomical predisposition to foraminal stenosis, namely a larger pedicle height (PH) to vertebral body height (VH) ratio, leaving less room below the pedicle for the exiting nerve root compared to asymptomatic patients.

Patient Sample: 66 Patients were divided in two groups. The surgical group consisted of 37 patients (average age of 61 years) who presented with severe radicular symptoms resisting to conservative measures and requiring decompression and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The control group consisted of 29 patients (average age of 51 years) presenting with low back pain (LBP) but with no radicular symptoms and who were treated conservatively.

Methods: We measured VH at the level of the posterior wall as well as PH on parasagittal images (CT or MRI) on all lumbar levels (L1 to L5). Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test.

Results: No difference in PH was found between the two groups for L1 to L4 levels. By contrast, there was a highly statistically significant difference in VH between the two groups from L1 to L4 level. In the surgical group, the VH was smaller (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Symptomatic patients with foraminal stenosis have smaller VH leading to lesser space beneath the pedicle and putting the exiting nerve root at risk in cases of spondylolisthesis or disc degeneration.

Citing Articles

A morphometric analysis of all lumbar intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies in degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Abu-Leil S, Floman Y, Bronstein Y, Masharawi Y Eur Spine J. 2016; 25(8):2535-45.

PMID: 27349752 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4673-3.

The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2015.

Benoist M Eur Spine J. 2015; 25(1):14-23.

PMID: 26596729 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4322-2.

In vivo dynamic changes of dimensions in the lumbar intervertebral foramen.

Zhong W, Driscoll S, Tsai T, Wang S, Mao H, Cha T Spine J. 2015; 15(7):1653-9.

PMID: 25797808 PMC: 4475422. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.015.

References

Hasegawa T, An H, Haughton V, Nowicki B . Lumbar foraminal stenosis: critical heights of the intervertebral discs and foramina. A cryomicrotome study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77(1):32-8. View

Torun F, Tuna H, Buyukmumcu M, Caglar S, Baysefer A . The lumbar roots and pedicles: a morphometric analysis and anatomical features. J Clin Neurosci. 2008; 15(8):895-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2007.08.006. View

Cinotti G, De Santis P, Nofroni I, Postacchini F . Stenosis of lumbar intervertebral foramen: anatomic study on predisposing factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(3):223-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200202010-00002. View

Fu K, Rhagavan P, Shaffrey C, Chernavvsky D, Smith J . Prevalence, severity, and impact of foraminal and canal stenosis among adults with degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurgery. 2011; 69(6):1181-7. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822a9aeb. View

Torun F, Dolgun H, Tuna H, Attar A, Uz A, Erdem A . Morphometric analysis of the roots and neural foramina of the lumbar vertebrae. Surg Neurol. 2006; 66(2):148-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.02.041. View

Gilsanz V, Loro M, Roe T, Sayre J, Gilsanz R, Schulz E . Vertebral size in elderly women with osteoporosis. Mechanical implications and relationship to fractures. J Clin Invest. 1995; 95(5):2332-7. PMC: 295847. DOI: 10.1172/JCI117925. View

Jenis L, An H . Spine update. Lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(3):389-94. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200002010-00022. View

Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, Tansey R, Wardlaw D, Smith F . Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(21):1919-24. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd. View

Kaneko Y, Matsumoto M, Takaishi H, Nishiwaki Y, Momoshima S, Toyama Y . Morphometric analysis of the lumbar intervertebral foramen in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis by multidetector-row computed tomography. Eur Spine J. 2012; 21(12):2594-602. PMC: 3508233. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2408-7. View

10.

Nowicki B, Haughton V, Schmidt T, Lim T, An H, Riley 3rd L . Occult lumbar lateral spinal stenosis in neural foramina subjected to physiologic loading. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996; 17(9):1605-14. PMC: 8338311. View

11.

Ferrar L, Roux C, Reid D, Felsenberg D, Gluer C, Eastell R . Prevalence of non-fracture short vertebral height is similar in premenopausal and postmenopausal women: the osteoporosis and ultrasound study. Osteoporos Int. 2011; 23(3):1035-40. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1657-3. View

12.

SIMMONS E, Jackson R . The management of nerve root entrapment syndromes associated with the collapsing scoliosis of idiopathic lumbar and thoracolumbar curves. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1979; 4(6):533-41. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-197911000-00016. View

13.

Fujiwara A, An H, Lim T, Haughton V . Morphologic changes in the lumbar intervertebral foramen due to flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation: an in vitro anatomic and biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(8):876-82. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200104150-00010. View

14.

Schulte T, Heidenreich J, Schilling A, Stendel R, Pietila T, Hopfenmuller W . Comparison of metric analysis of spinal structures, exemplarily of the ligamentum flavum, obtained with CT and MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2004; 52(3):224-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.11.022. View