» Articles » PMID: 7050657

Recombinationless Meiosis in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Overview
Journal Mol Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 1981 Oct 1
PMID 7050657
Citations 90
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We have utilized the single equational meiotic division conferred by the spo13-1 mutation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. Klapholtz and R. E. Esposito, Genetics 96:589-611, 1980) as a technique to study the genetic control of meiotic recombination and to analyze the meiotic effects of several radiation-sensitive mutations (rad6-1, rad50-1, and rad52-1) which have been reported to reduce meiotic recombination (Game et al., Genetics 94:51-68, 1980); Prakash et al., Genetics 94:31-50, 1980). The spo13-1 mutation eliminates the meiosis I reductional segregation, but does not significantly affect other meiotic events (including recombination). Because of the unique meiosis it confers, the spo13-1 mutation provides an opportunity to recover viable meiotic products in a Rec- background. In contrast to the single rad50-1 mutant, we found that the double rad50-1 spo13-1 mutant produced viable ascospores after meiosis and sporulation. These spores were nonrecombinant: meiotic crossing-over was reduced at least 150-fold, and no increase in meiotic gene conversion was observed over mitotic background levels. The rad50-1 mutation did not, however, confer a Rec- phenotype in mitosis; rather, it increased both spontaneous crossing-over and gene conversion. The spore inviability conferred by the single rad6-1 and rad52-1 mutations was not eliminated by the presence of the spo13-1 mutation. Thus, only the rad50 gene has been unambiguously identified by analysis of viable meiotic ascospores as a component of the meiotic recombination system.

Citing Articles

Mechanism and Control of Meiotic DNA Double-Strand Break Formation in .

Yadav V, Claeys Bouuaert C Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9:642737.

PMID: 33748134 PMC: 7968521. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.642737.


High throughput sequencing reveals alterations in the recombination signatures with diminishing Spo11 activity.

Rockmill B, Lefrancois P, Voelkel-Meiman K, Oke A, Roeder G, Fung J PLoS Genet. 2013; 9(10):e1003932.

PMID: 24204324 PMC: 3814317. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003932.


Hyper-recombination and mutator effects of the mms9-1, mms13-1, and mms21-1 mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Montelone B, Prakash S, Prakash L Curr Genet. 2013; 4(3):223-32.

PMID: 24185997 DOI: 10.1007/BF00420503.


Multiple mutant analysis of recombination in yeast.

Malone R Mol Gen Genet. 2012; 189(3):405-12.

PMID: 22567676 DOI: 10.1007/BF00325902.


Pch2 modulates chromatid partner choice during meiotic double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Zanders S, Sonntag Brown M, Chen C, Alani E Genetics. 2011; 188(3):511-21.

PMID: 21515575 PMC: 3176543. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.129031.


References
1.
Liras P, McCusker J, Mascioli S, Haber J . Characterization of a mutation in yeast causing nonrandom chromosome loss during mitosis. Genetics. 1978; 88(4 Pt 1):651-71. PMC: 1213811. View

2.
Esposito R, Esposito M . Genetic recombination and commitment to meiosis in Saccharomyces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974; 71(8):3172-6. PMC: 388644. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.71.8.3172. View

3.
Resnick M . The repair of double-strand breaks in DNA; a model involving recombination. J Theor Biol. 1976; 59(1):97-106. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(76)80025-2. View

4.
Baker B, Carpenter A, Esposito M, Esposito R, Sandler L . The genetic control of meiosis. Annu Rev Genet. 1976; 10:53-134. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ge.10.120176.000413. View

5.
Fogel S, Roth R . Mutations affecting meiotic gene conversion in yeast. Mol Gen Genet. 1974; 130(3):189-201. DOI: 10.1007/BF00268799. View