» Articles » PMID: 6943590

Ultraviolet Light-induced Labeling by Noncompetitive Blockers of the Acetylcholine Receptor from Torpedo Marmorata

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 1981 Jun 1
PMID 6943590
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reversible ligands were attached covalently to membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata by a method which is generally applicable and does not require the synthesis of specially designed molecules. UV irradiation of the receptor in the presence of [3H]trimethisoquin, [3H]phencyclidine, or [3H]perhydrohistrionicotoxin resulted in the labeling of the binding site(s) for these noncompetitive blockers of the permeability response. The labeling of the delta chain was enhanced by carbamoylcholine, and this increase was blocked by snake alpha-toxins. The effect of carbamoylcholine on [3H]trimethisoquin binding was more pronounced than with the other two noncompetitive blockers; in all instances, the labeling was abolished by unlabeled histrionicotoxin. These three compounds therefore interact with the high-affinity site for noncompetitive blockers. Incorporation of radioactivity also occurred into the alpha chain but either was insensitive to cholinergic effectors or decreased in the presence of carbamoylcholine (or snake alpha-toxin), probably as a result of an interaction with the acetylcholine-binding site. In contrast to the other noncompetitive blockers tested, [3H]chlorpromazine heavily labeled the four receptor polypeptides (alpha, beta, gamma, delta), and this labeling also was enhanced by carbamoylcholine and decreased by histrionicotoxin. These data indicate a contribution of the delta chain to the binding site(s) of several well-characterized noncompetitive blockers and suggest that other receptor polypeptides may also contribute to this binding.

Citing Articles

Allosteric binding site in a Cys-loop receptor ligand-binding domain unveiled in the crystal structure of ELIC in complex with chlorpromazine.

Nys M, Wijckmans E, Farinha A, Yoluk O, Andersson M, Brams M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(43):E6696-E6703.

PMID: 27791038 PMC: 5087063. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1603101113.


The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: the founding father of the pentameric ligand-gated ion channel superfamily.

Changeux J J Biol Chem. 2012; 287(48):40207-15.

PMID: 23038257 PMC: 3504736. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.R112.407668.


Emerging approaches to probing ion channel structure and function.

Li W, Xu T Neurosci Bull. 2012; 28(4):351-74.

PMID: 22833035 PMC: 5561889. DOI: 10.1007/s12264-012-1248-0.


Phencyclidine (PCP), in Nanomolar Concentrations, Binds to Synaptosomes and Blocks Certain Potassium Channels: Covalent Labeling of K Channels with PCP.

Blaustein M, Ickowicz R Biophys J. 2009; 45(1):119-21.

PMID: 19431533 PMC: 1435291. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84132-6.


Cholesterol-induced conformational change in SCAP enhanced by Insig proteins and mimicked by cationic amphiphiles.

Adams C, Goldstein J, Brown M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(19):10647-52.

PMID: 12963821 PMC: 196858. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1534833100.


References
1.
Obrig T, Antonoff R, Kirwin K, FERGUSON Jr J . The binding of adenosine-3',5'-monophosphate by messenger ribonucleoprotein-like particles. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1975; 66(1):437-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-291x(75)80347-0. View

2.
HIGMAN H, Podleski T, Bartels E . APPARENT DISSOCIATION CONSTANTS BETWEEN CARBAMYLCHOLINE, DELTA-TUBOCURARINE AND THE RECEPTOR. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1963; 75:187-93. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3002(63)90597-3. View

3.
Maelicke A, Fulpius B, Klett R, Reich E . Acetylcholine receptor. Responses to drug binding. J Biol Chem. 1977; 252(14):4811-30. View

4.
Schimmel P, Budzik G . Photo-cross-linking of protein-nucleic acid complexes. Methods Enzymol. 1977; 46:168-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(77)46018-x. View

5.
Sobel A, Weber M, Changeux J . Large-scale purification of the acetylcholine-receptor protein in its membrane-bound and detergent-extracted forms from Torpedo marmorata electric organ. Eur J Biochem. 1977; 80(1):215-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11874.x. View