Modeling Feature Perception in Brief Displays with Evidence for Positive Interdependencies

Overview

Journal Percept Psychophys

Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology

Date 1984 Jul 1

PMID 6493963

Citations 6

Authors

J T Townsend

G G Hu

R J Evans

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

Feature contingencies when reading letter strings.

Coates D, Bernard J, Chung S Vision Res. 2019; 156:84-95.

PMID: 30660632 PMC: 7781227. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.01.005.

Validation of a New Three-Item Self-Report Measure for Medication Adherence.

Wilson I, Lee Y, Michaud J, Fowler Jr F, Rogers W AIDS Behav. 2016; 20(11):2700-2708.

PMID: 27098408 PMC: 5071118. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-016-1406-x.

Cognitive and field testing of a new set of medication adherence self-report items for HIV care.

Wilson I, Fowler Jr F, Cosenza C, Michaud J, Bentkover J, Rana A AIDS Behav. 2013; 18(12):2349-58.

PMID: 24077970 PMC: 4000749. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-013-0610-1.

The multidimensional analysis of asymmetries in alphabetic confusion matrices: evidence for global-to-local and local-to-global processing.

Dawson M, Harshman R Percept Psychophys. 1986; 40(6):370-83.

PMID: 3808903 DOI: 10.3758/bf03208196.

Feature sensitivity, bias, and interdependencies as a function of energy and payoffs.

Townsend J, Hu G, Kadlec H Percept Psychophys. 1988; 43(6):575-91.

PMID: 3399356 DOI: 10.3758/bf03207746.

References

Prinzmetal W . Principles of feature integration in visual perception. Percept Psychophys. 1981; 30(4):330-40. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206147. View

Garner W, Haun F . Letter identification as a function of type of perceptual limitation and type of attribute. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1978; 4(2):199-209. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.4.2.199. View

Dodwell P . The Lie transformation group model of visual perception. Percept Psychophys. 1983; 34(1):1-16. DOI: 10.3758/bf03205890. View

Lupker S . On the nature of perceptual information during letter perception. Percept Psychophys. 1979; 25(4):303-12. DOI: 10.3758/bf03198809. View

Kinchla R, Hoffman J . Attending to different levels of structure in a visual image. Percept Psychophys. 1983; 33(1):1-10. DOI: 10.3758/bf03205860. View

Townsend J, Ashby F . Experimental test of contemporary mathematical models of visual letter recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982; 8(6):834-54. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.8.6.834. View

Garner W, Morton J . Perceptual independence: definitions, models, and experimental paradigms. Psychol Bull. 1969; 72(4):233-59. DOI: 10.1037/h0028024. View

FLAVELL J, DRAGUNS J . A microgenetic approach to perception and thought. Psychol Bull. 1957; 54(3):197-217. DOI: 10.1037/h0041350. View

Rumelhart D, Siple P . Process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words. Psychol Rev. 1974; 81(2):99-118. DOI: 10.1037/h0036117. View

10.

Eriksen C, Schultz D . Information processing in visual search: a continuous flow conception and experimental results. Percept Psychophys. 1979; 25(4):249-63. DOI: 10.3758/bf03198804. View

11.

Wandmacher J . Multicomponent theory of perception: feature extraction and response decision in visual identification. Psychol Res. 1976; 39(1):17-37. DOI: 10.1007/BF00308943. View

12.

Rumelhart D, McClelland J . An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychol Rev. 1982; 89(1):60-94. View

13.

Townsend J, Hu G, Ashby F . Perceptual sampling of orthogonal straight line features. Psychol Res. 1981; 43(3):259-75. DOI: 10.1007/BF00308451. View

14.

Loomis J . Analysis of tactile and visual confusion matrices. Percept Psychophys. 1982; 31(1):41-52. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206199. View