The Multidimensional Analysis of Asymmetries in Alphabetic Confusion Matrices: Evidence for Global-to-local and Local-to-global Processing

Overview

Journal Percept Psychophys

Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology

Date 1986 Dec 1

PMID 3808903

Citations 1

Authors

M R Dawson

R A Harshman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

Alphabetic letter identification: effects of perceivability, similarity, and bias.

Mueller S, Weidemann C Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011; 139(1):19-37.

PMID: 22036587 PMC: 3271710. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.014.

References

Garner W, Haun F . Letter identification as a function of type of perceptual limitation and type of attribute. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1978; 4(2):199-209. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.4.2.199. View

Appelman I, MAYZNER M . Application of geometric models to letter recognition: distance and density. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1982; 111(1):60-100. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.111.1.60. View

Keren G, Baggen S . Recognition models of alphanumeric characters. Percept Psychophys. 1981; 29(3):234-46. DOI: 10.3758/bf03207290. View

Ward L . Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982; 8(4):562-81. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.8.4.562. View

Navon D . Do attention and decision follow perception Comment on Miller. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981; 7(6):1175-82. View

Bouma H . Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. Vision Res. 1971; 11(5):459-74. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(71)90087-3. View

Appelle S . Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. Psychol Bull. 1972; 78(4):266-78. DOI: 10.1037/h0033117. View

Lupker S . On the nature of perceptual information during letter perception. Percept Psychophys. 1979; 25(4):303-12. DOI: 10.3758/bf03198809. View

Townsend J, Hu G, Evans R . Modeling feature perception in brief displays with evidence for positive interdependencies. Percept Psychophys. 1984; 36(1):35-49. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206352. View

10.

Gilmore G, Hersh H, Caramazza A, Griffin J . Multidimensional letter similarity derived from recognition errors. Percept Psychophys. 1979; 25(5):425-31. DOI: 10.3758/bf03199852. View

11.

Kunnapas T . Visual perception of capital letters. Multidimensional ratio scaling and multidimensional similarity. Scand J Psychol. 1966; 7(3):189-96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1966.tb01352.x. View

12.

Marr D, Hildreth E . Theory of edge detection. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1980; 207(1167):187-217. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1980.0020. View

13.

Coffin S . Spatial frequency analysis of block letters does not predict experimental confusions. Percept Psychophys. 1978; 23(1):69-74. DOI: 10.3758/bf03214297. View

14.

Krumhansl C . Density versus feature weights as predictors of visual identifications: comment on Appelman and Mayzner. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1982; 111(1):101-8. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.111.1.101. View

15.

Townsend J, Ashby F . Experimental test of contemporary mathematical models of visual letter recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982; 8(6):834-54. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.8.6.834. View

16.

TREISMAN A, Gelade G . A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol. 1980; 12(1):97-136. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5. View

17.

Wolford G . Perturbation model for letter identification. Psychol Rev. 1975; 82(3):184-99. View

18.

Wandmacher J . Multicomponent theory of perception: feature extraction and response decision in visual identification. Psychol Res. 1976; 39(1):17-37. DOI: 10.1007/BF00308943. View

19.

Loomis J . Analysis of tactile and visual confusion matrices. Percept Psychophys. 1982; 31(1):41-52. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206199. View