» Articles » PMID: 660095

Letter Identification As a Function of Type of Perceptual Limitation and Type of Attribute

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 1978 May 1
PMID 660095
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is argued that the distribution of errors in letter identification depends on two factors: (a) whether the set of letters is defined by features that exist or do not exist or by dimensions that exist at some positive value, and (b) whether errors are produced by process limitation in which the letter patterns are distorted or by state limitation in which there is inadequate energy. A specific hypothesis tested was that error distributions reflect the attribute structure under both types of limitation if dimensions define the letter set, but only under a process limitation if features define the letter set. Under a state limitation, feature set errors are primarily produced by a loss of features, so that a letter with more features is called a letter with fewer features more often than conversely. An experiment completely validated the hypothesis under test. In addition, the relative discriminabilities of two dimensions defining a dimension set of letters was reversed from state to process limitation. Thus the attribute structure derived from error distributions is not invariant across types of perceptual limitation, nor are distances between letter pairs always symmetric.

Citing Articles

Parafoveal letter identification in Russian: Confusion matrices based on error rates.

Alexeeva S Behav Res Methods. 2024; 56(8):8567-8587.

PMID: 39261445 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02492-3.


The effects of visual similarity on proofreading for misspellings.

Healy A Mem Cognit. 1981; 9(5):453-60.

PMID: 7321863 DOI: 10.3758/bf03202339.


The role of configuration in the identification of visually degraded words.

Garner W Mem Cognit. 1981; 9(5):445-52.

PMID: 7321862 DOI: 10.3758/bf03202338.


Recognition models of alphanumeric characters.

Keren G, Baggen S Percept Psychophys. 1981; 29(3):234-46.

PMID: 7267275 DOI: 10.3758/bf03207290.


Independence versus interference in the perceptual processing of letters.

Santee J, Egeth H Percept Psychophys. 1982; 31(2):101-16.

PMID: 7079090 DOI: 10.3758/bf03206210.