» Articles » PMID: 30660632

Feature Contingencies when Reading Letter Strings

Overview
Journal Vision Res
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2019 Jan 21
PMID 30660632
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many models posit the use of distinctive spatial features to recognize letters of the alphabet, a fundamental component of reading. It has also been hypothesized that when letters are in close proximity, visual crowding may cause features to mislocalize between nearby letters, causing identification errors. Here, we took a data-driven approach to investigate these aspects of textual processing. Using data collected from subjects identifying each letter in thousands of lower-case letter trigrams presented in the peripheral visual field, we found characteristic error patterns in the results suggestive of the use of particular spatial features. Distinctive features were seldom entirely missed, and we found evidence for errors due to doubling, masking, and migration of features. Dependencies both amongst neighboring letters and in the responses revealed the contingent nature of processing letter strings, challenging the most basic models of reading that ignore either crowding or featural decomposition.

Citing Articles

Parafoveal letter identification in Russian: Confusion matrices based on error rates.

Alexeeva S Behav Res Methods. 2024; 56(8):8567-8587.

PMID: 39261445 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02492-3.


Multidimensional feature interactions in visual crowding: When  configural  cues  eliminate the polarity advantage.

Rummens K, Sayim B J Vis. 2022; 22(6):2.

PMID: 35503508 PMC: 9078080. DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.6.2.


Atypical visual field asymmetries in redundancy masking.

Yildirim F, Coates D, Sayim B J Vis. 2022; 22(5):4.

PMID: 35412555 PMC: 9012886. DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.5.4.


Spatial Attention Enhances Crowded Stimulus Encoding Across Modeled Receptive Fields by Increasing Redundancy of Feature Representations.

Theiss J, Bowen J, Silver M Neural Comput. 2021; 34(1):190-218.

PMID: 34710898 PMC: 8693207. DOI: 10.1162/neco_a_01447.


The generality of the critical spacing for crowded optotypes: From Bouma to the 21st century.

Coates D, Ludowici C, Chung S J Vis. 2021; 21(11):18.

PMID: 34694326 PMC: 8556556. DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.11.18.


References
1.
Hanus D, Vul E . Quantifying error distributions in crowding. J Vis. 2013; 13(4):17. DOI: 10.1167/13.4.17. View

2.
Strasburger H . Dancing letters'and ticks that buzz around aimlessly: on the origin of crowding. Perception. 2014; 43(9):963-76. DOI: 10.1068/p7726. View

3.
Townsend J, Hu G, Evans R . Modeling feature perception in brief displays with evidence for positive interdependencies. Percept Psychophys. 1984; 36(1):35-49. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206352. View

4.
Wolford G . Perturbation model for letter identification. Psychol Rev. 1975; 82(3):184-99. View

5.
Grainger J, Rey A, Dufau S . Letter perception: from pixels to pandemonium. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008; 12(10):381-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.06.006. View