Influence of Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstructions on Coronary CT Angiography-based Fractional Flow Reserve with Photon-counting Detector CT: Intra-individual Comparison with Energy-integrating Detector CT

Overview

Journal Insights Imaging

Publisher Springer

Specialty Radiology

Date 2025 Feb 17

PMID 39961979

Authors

Giuseppe Tremamunno

Daniel Pinos

Emese Zsarnoczay

U Joseph Schoepf

Milan Vecsey-Nagy

Chiara Gnasso

Nicola Fink

Dmitrij Kravchenko

Muhammad Taha Hagar

Joseph Griffith 3rd

Jim ODoherty

Andrea Laghi

Tilman Emrich

Akos Varga-Szemes

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the impact of the photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT-based virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) reconstruction keV levels on CT-based fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), compared to the energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT.

Methods: Patients undergoing clinically indicated coronary CT angiography (CCTA) on an EID-CT were prospectively enrolled for a research CCTA on a PCD-CT within 30 days. PCD-CT datasets were reconstructed at VMI levels of 45, 55, 70, and 90 keV. CT-FFR was obtained semiautomatically using an on-site machine learning algorithm by two readers. CT-FFR ≤ 0.80 was considered hemodynamically significant.

Results: A total of 20 patients (63.3 ± 8.8 years; 13 men (65%) were included. Median CT-FFR values in the per-vessel analysis for PCD-CT scans were 0.86 (0.81-0.92) for 45 keV, 0.87 (0.80-0.93) for 55 keV, 0.85 (0.79-0.92) for 70 keV and 0.82 (0.76-0.89) for 90 keV, and 0.86 (0.71-0.93) for EID-CT. Comparison among different VMIs showed significant differences only for 45 vs. 90 keV (p < 0.001), and 55 vs. 90 keV (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the pairwise comparison between any VMI and EID-CT (all p > 0.05). PCD-CT at 70 keV showed the highest correlation (r = 0.83, p < 0.001), agreement (ICC: 0.90 (0.84-0.94)), and the lowest bias (mean bias -0.01; limits of agreement, 0.84/0.94) when compared to EID-CT.

Conclusion: VMI reconstructions showed significant influence on CT-FFR values only at the extreme levels of the spectrum, while no significant differences were found in comparison with EID-CT. VMI at 70 keV demonstrates the highest correlation and agreement, with the lowest bias compared to EID-CT.

Critical Relevance Statement: Evidence on novel spectral photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT's impact on CT-fractional flow reserve (FFR) is limited; our results demonstrate the feasibility of CT-FFR using PCD-CT, showing no significant differences between various virtual monoenergetic images and energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT values KEY POINTS: The impact of spectral photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT on CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) is unclear. Spectral PCD-CT-based CT-FFR is feasible, differing only at extreme virtual monoenergetic image levels. CT-FFR from PCD-CT at 70 keV showed the strongest correlation with energy-integrating detector-CT.

References

Fairbairn T, Nieman K, Akasaka T, Norgaard B, Berman D, Raff G . Real-world clinical utility and impact on clinical decision-making of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: lessons from the ADVANCE Registry. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(41):3701-3711. PMC: 6215963. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy530. View

Stegehuis V, Wijntjens G, Piek J, van de Hoef T . Fractional Flow Reserve or Coronary Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion : Implications of FFR as an Imperfect Reference Standard for Myocardial Ischemia. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018; 20(9):77. PMC: 6061210. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-018-1017-4. View

Al Rifai M, Ahmed A, Alahdab F, Al-Mallah M . Clinical utility of coronary artery computed tomography angiography- What we know and What's new?. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2022; 75:12-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2022.10.013. View

Gao Y, Zhao N, Song L, Hu H, Jiang T, Chen W . Diagnostic Performance of CT FFR With a New Parameter Optimized Computational Fluid Dynamics Algorithm From the CT-FFR-CHINA Trial: Characteristic Analysis of Gray Zone Lesions and Misdiagnosed Lesions. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:819460. PMC: 8980684. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.819460. View

Vecsey-Nagy M, Varga-Szemes A, Schoepf U, Tremamunno G, Fink N, Zsarnoczay E . Ultra-high resolution coronary CT angiography on photon-counting detector CT: bi-centre study on the impact of quantum iterative reconstruction on image quality and accuracy of stenosis measurements. Eur J Radiol. 2024; 176:111517. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111517. View

Rajagopal J, Farhadi F, Richards T, Nikpanah M, Sahbaee P, Shanbhag S . Evaluation of Coronary Plaques and Stents with Conventional and Photon-counting CT: Benefits of High-Resolution Photon-counting CT. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2021; 3(5):e210102. PMC: 8581588. DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2021210102. View

Narula J, Chandrashekhar Y, Ahmadi A, Abbara S, Berman D, Blankstein R . SCCT 2021 Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020; 15(3):192-217. PMC: 8713482. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.11.001. View

Patel M, Norgaard B, Fairbairn T, Nieman K, Akasaka T, Berman D . 1-Year Impact on Medical Practice and Clinical Outcomes of FFR: The ADVANCE Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 13(1 Pt 1):97-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.003. View

Zsarnoczay E, Pinos D, Schoepf U, Fink N, ODoherty J, Gnasso C . Intra-individual comparison of coronary CT angiography-based FFR between energy-integrating and photon-counting detector CT systems. Int J Cardiol. 2023; 399:131684. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131684. View

10.

Tesche C, De Cecco C, Albrecht M, Duguay T, Bayer 2nd R, Litwin S . Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve. Radiology. 2017; 285(1):17-33. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162641. View

11.

Tesche C, Otani K, De Cecco C, Coenen A, De Geer J, Kruk M . Influence of Coronary Calcium on Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning CT-FFR: Results From MACHINE Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 13(3):760-770. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.06.027. View

12.

Zsarnoczay E, Varga-Szemes A, Emrich T, Szilveszter B, van der Werf N, Mastrodicasa D . Characterizing the Heart and the Myocardium With Photon-Counting CT. Invest Radiol. 2023; 58(7):505-514. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000956. View

13.

Adjedj J, De Bruyne B, Flore V, Di Gioia G, Ferrara A, Pellicano M . Significance of Intermediate Values of Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. 2016; 133(5):502-8. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018747. View

14.

Flohr T, Schmidt B . Technical Basics and Clinical Benefits of Photon-Counting CT. Invest Radiol. 2023; 58(7):441-450. PMC: 10259209. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000980. View

15.

Norgaard B, Leipsic J, Gaur S, Seneviratne S, Ko B, Ito H . Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63(12):1145-1155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.043. View

16.

Pinos D, Griffith 3rd J, Emrich T, Schoepf U, ODoherty J, Zsarnoczay E . Intra-individual comparison of image quality of the coronary arteries between photon-counting detector and energy-integrating detector CT systems. Eur J Radiol. 2023; 166:111008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111008. View

17.

Douglas P, Pontone G, Hlatky M, Patel M, Norgaard B, Byrne R . Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource.... Eur Heart J. 2015; 36(47):3359-67. PMC: 4677273. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv444. View

18.

Malakar A, Choudhury D, Halder B, Paul P, Uddin A, Chakraborty S . A review on coronary artery disease, its risk factors, and therapeutics. J Cell Physiol. 2019; 234(10):16812-16823. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.28350. View

19.

Miller J, Rochitte C, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I . Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(22):2324-36. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806576. View

20.

Khalid N, Pandey Y, Khalid U, Kamran H, Wermers J, Chhabra L . Modes of failure with fractional flow reserve guidewires: Insights from the manufacturer and user facility device experience database. World J Cardiol. 2021; 13(7):223-229. PMC: 8326154. DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i7.223. View