» Articles » PMID: 30165613

Real-world Clinical Utility and Impact on Clinical Decision-making of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Lessons from the ADVANCE Registry

Abstract

Aims: Non-invasive assessment of stable chest pain patients is a critical determinant of resource utilization and clinical outcomes. Increasingly coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with selective CCTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) is being used. The ADVANCE Registry, is a large prospective examination of using a CCTA and FFRCT diagnostic pathway in real-world settings, with the aim of determining the impact of this pathway on decision-making, downstream invasive coronary angiography (ICA), revascularization, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

Methods And Results: A total of 5083 patients with symptoms concerning for coronary artery disease (CAD) and atherosclerosis on CCTA were enrolled at 38 international sites from 15 July 2015 to 20 October 2017. Demographics, symptom status, CCTA and FFRCT findings, treatment plans, and 90 days outcomes were recorded. The primary endpoint of reclassification between core lab CCTA alone and CCTA plus FFRCT-based management plans occurred in 66.9% [confidence interval (CI): 64.8-67.6] of patients. Non-obstructive coronary disease was significantly lower in ICA patients with FFRCT ≤0.80 (14.4%) compared to patients with FFRCT >0.80 (43.8%, odds ratio 0.19, CI: 0.15-0.25, P < 0.001). In total, 72.3% of subjects undergoing ICA with FFRCT ≤0.80 were revascularized. No death/myocardial infarction (MI) occurred within 90 days in patients with FFRCT >0.80 (n = 1529), whereas 19 (0.6%) MACE [hazard ratio (HR) 19.75, CI: 1.19-326, P = 0.0008] and 14 (0.3%) death/MI (HR 14.68, CI 0.88-246, P = 0.039) occurred in subjects with an FFRCT ≤0.80.

Conclusions: In a large international multicentre population, FFRCT modified treatment recommendation in two-thirds of subjects as compared to CCTA alone, was associated with less negative ICA, predicted revascularization, and identified subjects at low risk of adverse events through 90 days.

Citing Articles

Comparison of cardiac computed tomography recommendations in recent ESC vs. ACC/AHA guidelines.

Dayer N, Ciocca N, Antiochos P, Lu H, Auberson D, Meier D Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025; .

PMID: 40085283 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-025-03375-0.


Coronary CT Angiography in the Emergency Department: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.

De Vita A, Covino M, Pontecorvo S, Buonamassa G, Marino A, Marano R J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 39997482 PMC: 11856466. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd12020048.


Influence of virtual monoenergetic reconstructions on coronary CT angiography-based fractional flow reserve with photon-counting detector CT: intra-individual comparison with energy-integrating detector CT.

Tremamunno G, Pinos D, Zsarnoczay E, Schoepf U, Vecsey-Nagy M, Gnasso C Insights Imaging. 2025; 16(1):36.

PMID: 39961979 PMC: 11832851. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-025-01927-5.


Novel Non-invasive Fractional Flow Reserve from Coronary CT Angiography to Determine Ischemic Coronary Stenosis.

Cherukuri L, Birudaraju D, Budoff M US Cardiol. 2024; 15:e06.

PMID: 39720504 PMC: 11664784. DOI: 10.15420/usc.2020.24.


Enhancing coronary artery plaque analysis via artificial intelligence-driven cardiovascular computed tomography.

Xia J, Bachour K, Suleiman A, Roberts J, Sayed S, Cho G Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2024; 18:17539447241303399.

PMID: 39625215 PMC: 11615974. DOI: 10.1177/17539447241303399.


References
1.
Williams M, Hunter A, Shah A, Assi V, Lewis S, Smith J . Use of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Guide Management of Patients With Coronary Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67(15):1759-1768. PMC: 4829708. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.026. View

2.
Norgaard B, Jensen J, Blanke P, Sand N, Rabbat M, Leipsic J . Coronary CT Angiography Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The Game Changer in Noninvasive Testing. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017; 19(11):112. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-017-0923-1. View

3.
Tonino P, Fearon W, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd K, Leesar M, Ver Lee P . Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55(25):2816-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.096. View

4.
Desai N, Bradley S, Parzynski C, Nallamothu B, Chan P, Spertus J . Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization and Trends in Utilization, Patient Selection, and Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JAMA. 2015; 314(19):2045-53. PMC: 5459470. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.13764. View

5.
Norgaard B, Leipsic J, Gaur S, Seneviratne S, Ko B, Ito H . Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63(12):1145-1155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.043. View