» Articles » PMID: 39877085

Proteomics-based Aging Clocks in Midlife and Late-life and Risk of Dementia

Abstract

Background: Biological age can be quantified by composite proteomic scores, called aging clocks. We investigated whether biological age acceleration (a discrepancy between chronological and biological age) in midlife and late-life is associated with cognitive function and risk of dementia.

Methods: We used two population-based cohort studies: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Proteomics-based aging clocks (PACs) were created in ARIC at midlife (mean age: 58 years, n=11,758) and late-life (mean age: 77 years, n=4,934) using elastic net regression models in two-thirds of dementia-free participants and validated in the remaining one-third of participants. Age acceleration (AA) was calculated as residuals after regressing PACs on chronological age. We validated the midlife PAC in the MESA cohort (mean age: 62 years, n=5,829). We used multivariable linear and Cox proportional hazards regression to assess the association of AA with cognitive function and dementia incidence, respectively.

Results: In ARIC, every five years AA was associated with lower global cognitive function: difference: -0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.16, -0.06) using midlife AA and difference: -0.17, CI: -0.23, -0.12 using late-life AA. Consistently, midlife AA was associated with higher risk of dementia (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.20 [CI: 1.04, 1.36]) and more prominently when using late-life AA (HR: 2.14 [CI:1.67, 2.73]). Similar findings were observed in the MESA study: every five years AA was associated with lower global cognitive function (difference: -0.08 [CI: -0.14, -0.03]) and higher risk of dementia (HR:1.23 [CI: 1.04, 1.46]).

Conclusion: Accelerated biological age - as defined by the plasma proteome - is associated with lower cognitive function and predicts a higher risk of dementia in midlife and more prominently in late-life.

References
1.
Knopman D, Pike J, Gottesman R, Sharrett A, Windham B, Mosley Jr T . Patterns of cognitive domain abnormalities enhance discrimination of dementia risk prediction: The ARIC study. Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 20(7):4559-4571. PMC: 11247695. DOI: 10.1002/alz.13876. View

2.
Rutledge J, Oh H, Wyss-Coray T . Measuring biological age using omics data. Nat Rev Genet. 2022; 23(12):715-727. PMC: 10048602. DOI: 10.1038/s41576-022-00511-7. View

3.
Sathyan S, Ayers E, Adhikari D, Gao T, Milman S, Barzilai N . Biological Age Acceleration and Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2023; 93(6):1187-1197. PMC: 10865507. DOI: 10.1002/ana.26624. View

4.
Galkin F, Mamoshina P, Aliper A, de Magalhaes J, Gladyshev V, Zhavoronkov A . Biohorology and biomarkers of aging: Current state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. Ageing Res Rev. 2020; 60:101050. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101050. View

5.
Gold L, Ayers D, Bertino J, Bock C, Bock A, Brody E . Aptamer-based multiplexed proteomic technology for biomarker discovery. PLoS One. 2010; 5(12):e15004. PMC: 3000457. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015004. View