Validity of a Heart Rate Monitor for Heart Rate Variability Analysis During an Orthostatic Challenge

Objectives: Compare HRV measures from an electrocardiogram (ECG) Holter and a HRM as a tool for investigating ANS response for post-concussion rehabilitation follow-up.

Methods: Twenty-seven participants ( = 27; 15 females, 12 males), 18 to 35 years old, non-smoking, no history of cardiac illness and physically active (3 times per week, 60 mins, moderate intensity exercise) participated in the study. ECG signals and HRM were recorded beat-to-beat (R-R) simultaneously. A motorized tilt table was set at 0 degree for supine and 85 degrees for standing position. Participants were instructed to remain for 7 minutes in each position. R-R signals from both Holter and Polar HRM recording starting points were matched before further analysis. Bland-Altman plots were used to compare recordings from the Holter (gold standard) and the Polar HRM in both positions. Unpaired -test was used to compare measurements obtained with both systems. Significance was set at < 0.05.

Results: No significant differences were observed between R-R measurements taken with both systems under equal conditions (supine and standing). Same variables under similar conditions were significantly correlated ( = 0.0001).

Conclusion: Both recording and analysis systems (Holter vs HRM) yielded comparable results. Thus, both systems appear valid and interchangeable for HRV analysis for measuring orthostatic challenge HRV responses.