Validity of the Polar V800 Heart Rate Monitor to Measure RR Intervals at Rest

Overview

Journal Eur J Appl Physiol

Specialty Physiology

Date 2015 Dec 29

PMID 26708360

Citations 129

Authors

David Giles

Nick Draper

William Neil

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the validity of RR intervals and short-term heart rate variability (HRV) data obtained from the Polar V800 heart rate monitor, in comparison to an electrocardiograph (ECG).

Method: Twenty participants completed an active orthostatic test using the V800 and ECG. An improved method for the identification and correction of RR intervals was employed prior to HRV analysis. Agreement of the data was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA), and effect size (ES).

Results: A small number of errors were detected between ECG and Polar RR signal, with a combined error rate of 0.086 %. The RR intervals from ECG to V800 were significantly different, but with small ES for both supine corrected and standing corrected data (ES <0.001). The bias (LoA) were 0.06 (-4.33 to 4.45 ms) and 0.59 (-1.70 to 2.87 ms) for supine and standing intervals, respectively. The ICC was >0.999 for both supine and standing corrected intervals. When analysed with the same HRV software no significant differences were observed in any HRV parameters, for either supine or standing; the data displayed small bias and tight LoA, strong ICC (>0.99) and small ES (≤0.029).

Conclusions: The V800 improves over previous Polar models, with narrower LoA, stronger ICC and smaller ES for both the RR intervals and HRV parameters. The findings support the validity of the Polar V800 and its ability to produce RR interval recordings consistent with an ECG. In addition, HRV parameters derived from these recordings are also highly comparable.

Citing Articles

Test-Retest Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Photoplethysmography Finger Sensor to Collect Measures of Heart Rate Variability.

Rogers D, Himariotis A, Sherriff T, Proulx Q, Duong M, Noel S Sports (Basel). 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39997960 PMC: 11861371. DOI: 10.3390/sports13020029.

Enhancing Psychophysiological Well-Being Through Nature-Based Soundscapes: An Examination of Heart Rate Variability in a Cross-Over Study.

Kumpulainen S, Esmaeilzadeh S, Pesonen M, Brazao C, Pesola A Psychophysiology. 2025; 62(1):e14760.

PMID: 39803887 PMC: 11726612. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14760.

Exploring the Dynamics of Canine-Assisted Interactions: A Wearable Approach to Understanding Interspecies Well-Being.

Holder T, Nichols C, Summers E, Roberts D, Bozkurt A Animals (Basel). 2025; 14(24).

PMID: 39765532 PMC: 11672835. DOI: 10.3390/ani14243628.

Diagnostic accuracy of heart rate variability as a screening tool for mild neurocognitive disorder.

Czopek-Rowinska J, de Bruin E, Manser P Front Aging Neurosci. 2025; 16:1498687.

PMID: 39741522 PMC: 11685156. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1498687.

Comparison of 1-hour floatation-REST versus conventional napping on heart rate variability in active individuals.

Besson C, De Stefani G, Baggish A, Schmitt L, Millet G, Gremeaux V BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2024; 11(1):e002292.

PMID: 39691209 PMC: 11647359. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002292.

References

Gamelin F, Berthoin S, Bosquet L . Validity of the polar S810 heart rate monitor to measure R-R intervals at rest. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38(5):887-93. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000218135.79476.9c. View

Weir J . Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005; 19(1):231-40. DOI: 10.1519/15184.1. View

Nunan D, Jakovljevic D, Donovan G, Hodges L, Sandercock G, Brodie D . Levels of agreement for RR intervals and short-term heart rate variability obtained from the Polar S810 and an alternative system. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008; 103(5):529-37. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-008-0742-6. View

Vanderlei L, Silva R, Pastre C, Azevedo F, Godoy M . Comparison of the Polar S810i monitor and the ECG for the analysis of heart rate variability in the time and frequency domains. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2008; 41(10):854-9. DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2008005000039. View

Nunan D, Donovan G, Jakovljevic D, Hodges L, Sandercock G, Brodie D . Validity and reliability of short-term heart-rate variability from the Polar S810. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 41(1):243-50. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318184a4b1. View

Weippert M, Kumar M, Kreuzfeld S, Arndt D, Rieger A, Stoll R . Comparison of three mobile devices for measuring R-R intervals and heart rate variability: Polar S810i, Suunto t6 and an ambulatory ECG system. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010; 109(4):779-86. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1415-9. View

Mateo M, Blasco-Lafarga C, Martinez-Navarro I, Guzman J, Zabala M . Heart rate variability and pre-competitive anxiety in BMX discipline. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011; 112(1):113-23. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-1962-8. View

Thayer J, Ahs F, Fredrikson M, Sollers 3rd J, Wager T . A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011; 36(2):747-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.009. View

Wallen M, Hasson D, Theorell T, Canlon B, Osika W . Possibilities and limitations of the Polar RS800 in measuring heart rate variability at rest. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011; 112(3):1153-65. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-2079-9. View

10.

Quintana D, Heathers J, Kemp A . On the validity of using the Polar RS800 heart rate monitor for heart rate variability research. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012; 112(12):4179-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-012-2453-2. View

11.

Morales J, Garcia V, Garcia-Masso X, Salva P, Escobar R, Busca B . The use of heart rate variability in assessing precompetitive stress in high-standard judo athletes. Int J Sports Med. 2012; 34(2):144-51. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1323719. View

12.

Tarvainen M, Niskanen J, Lipponen J, Ranta-Aho P, Karjalainen P . Kubios HRV--heart rate variability analysis software. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013; 113(1):210-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.07.024. View

13.

Spallone V, Ziegler D, Freeman R, Bernardi L, Frontoni S, Pop-Busui R . Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in diabetes: clinical impact, assessment, diagnosis, and management. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2011; 27(7):639-53. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.1239. View

14.

Yi H, Hsieh Y, Wu T, Huang J, Lin W, Liang K . Heart rate variability parameters and ventricular arrhythmia correlate with pulmonary arterial pressure in adult patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Heart Lung. 2014; 43(6):534-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.05.010. View

15.

Porto L, Junqueira Jr L . Comparison of time-domain short-term heart interval variability analysis using a wrist-worn heart rate monitor and the conventional electrocardiogram. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009; 32(1):43-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02175.x. View

16.

Radespiel-Troger M, Rauh R, Mahlke C, Gottschalk T, Muck-Weymann M . Agreement of two different methods for measurement of heart rate variability. Clin Auton Res. 2003; 13(2):99-102. DOI: 10.1007/s10286-003-0085-7. View

17.

Brennan M, Palaniswami M, Kamen P . Do existing measures of Poincaré plot geometry reflect nonlinear features of heart rate variability?. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2001; 48(11):1342-7. DOI: 10.1109/10.959330. View

18.

Thayer J, Yamamoto S, Brosschot J . The relationship of autonomic imbalance, heart rate variability and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Int J Cardiol. 2009; 141(2):122-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.09.543. View

19.

Song H, Lehrer P . The effects of specific respiratory rates on heart rate and heart rate variability. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2003; 28(1):13-23. DOI: 10.1023/a:1022312815649. View

20.

Achten J, Jeukendrup A . Heart rate monitoring: applications and limitations. Sports Med. 2003; 33(7):517-38. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200333070-00004. View