Telemetry-derived Heart Rate Variability Responses to a Physical Stressor

Purpose: To assess the validity and reliability of telemetry-derived HRV responses to an orthostatic challenge.

Methods: Twenty healthy adults (26 + 5 years, 45% male) were tested on three separate mornings. Following 20-min supine rest, R-R intervals were recorded using a telemetric device during three conditions: BASE, TILT and RECOVERY. ECG was simultaneously used on 1 day for validity comparison. Measures of HRV included the following: standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN), the root-mean-square of successive differences (RMSSD) and the low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) spectral power.

Results: For all parameters, there was excellent agreement between devices for BASE (r = 0·96-0·99), TILT (r = 0·89-1·00) and RECOVERY (r = 0·96-1·00). For the telemetric device, between-day intraclass coefficient values for RMSDD, SDNN and HF were all above the 0·75 criterion for each condition, indicating excellent between-day reliability. For each condition, the reliability coefficient, expressed as a percentage of the mean (RC%), was marginally lower (greater reliability) for RMSDD (RC% 11-13) and SDNN (RC% 10-12) compared to HF (RC% 12-17). However, SDNN did not significantly respond to the orthostatic challenge.

Conclusion: Telemetric HRV, particularly RMSDD and HF, can be used to provide a sensitive, valid and reliable assessment of autonomic control of heart rate.