» Articles » PMID: 38398475

Influence of Cementation Mode and Ferrule Design on the Fatigue Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Endocrowns

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Feb 24
PMID 38398475
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Classic endocrowns made of dental ceramics are considered a promising alternative to traditional post-endodontic restorations. The use of circular ferrules in endocrowns is a topic of controversial discussion. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the effect of ferrule design and cementation mode on the fatigue resistance of zirconia endocrowns. : Eighty human molars were divided into four groups ( = 20): NFC (no-ferrule, conventional cementation), NFA (no-ferrule, adhesive luting), FC (ferrule, conventional cementation) and FA (ferrule, adhesive luting). Both the classic and the modified endocrown preparation with a two-millimeter ferrule design were carried out. Endocrowns were fabricated from zirconia using the CEREC system. After thermocycling, specimens were loaded according to the step-stress test up to 1500 N. : Failure rate was low; 88.8% of total specimens passed the step-stress test. Fractures were distributed between all groups; no significant differences in fatigue resistance were detected for preparation design and cementation mode. : Endocrowns appear to be a promising concept for endodontically treated molars. Ferrule and also cementation mode have only a minor influence on fatigue resistance of zirconia endocrowns. However, at very high forces, the marginal area of the ferrule represents a weak point.

Citing Articles

Endocrown-retained fixed partial dentures: Revolutionizing tooth restoration or risky business? A finite element study.

Muthukumar N, Natarajan P, Kumar S, Natarajan S J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025; 27(12):1234-1239.

PMID: 39959023 PMC: 11823574. DOI: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_657_24.


Effect of margin designs and loading conditions on the stress distribution of endocrowns: a finite element analysis.

Zeng B, Luo B, Hu J, Meng D, Zhang J, Cao X BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):657.

PMID: 38840138 PMC: 11151608. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04422-3.

References
1.
Ferrario V, Sforza C, Zanotti G, Tartaglia G . Maximal bite forces in healthy young adults as predicted by surface electromyography. J Dent. 2004; 32(6):451-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.02.009. View

2.
El Ghoul W, Ozcan M, Silwadi M, Salameh Z . Fracture resistance and failure modes of endocrowns manufactured with different CAD/CAM materials under axial and lateral loading. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31(4):378-387. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12486. View

3.
Carvalho A, Bruzi G, Giannini M, Magne P . Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM complete crowns with a simplified cementation process. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 111(4):310-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.020. View

4.
Turkistani A, Dimashkieh M, Rayyan M . Fracture resistance of teeth restored with endocrowns: An in vitro study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 32(4):389-394. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12549. View

5.
Caplan D, Cai J, Yin G, White B . Root canal filled versus non-root canal filled teeth: a retrospective comparison of survival times. J Public Health Dent. 2005; 65(2):90-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2005.tb02792.x. View