» Articles » PMID: 38004974

Microfluidic Blood Separation: Key Technologies and Critical Figures of Merit

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Nov 25
PMID 38004974
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Blood is a complex sample comprised mostly of plasma, red blood cells (RBCs), and other cells whose concentrations correlate to physiological or pathological health conditions. There are also many blood-circulating biomarkers, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and various pathogens, that can be used as measurands to diagnose certain diseases. Microfluidic devices are attractive analytical tools for separating blood components in point-of-care (POC) applications. These platforms have the potential advantage of, among other features, being compact and portable. These features can eventually be exploited in clinics and rapid tests performed in households and low-income scenarios. Microfluidic systems have the added benefit of only needing small volumes of blood drawn from patients (from nanoliters to milliliters) while integrating (within the devices) the steps required before detecting analytes. Hence, these systems will reduce the associated costs of purifying blood components of interest (e.g., specific groups of cells or blood biomarkers) for studying and quantifying collected blood fractions. The microfluidic blood separation field has grown since the 2000s, and important advances have been reported in the last few years. Nonetheless, real POC microfluidic blood separation platforms are still elusive. A widespread consensus on what key figures of merit should be reported to assess the quality and yield of these platforms has not been achieved. Knowing what parameters should be reported for microfluidic blood separations will help achieve that consensus and establish a clear road map to promote further commercialization of these devices and attain real POC applications. This review provides an overview of the separation techniques currently used to separate blood components for higher throughput separations (number of cells or particles per minute). We present a summary of the critical parameters that should be considered when designing such devices and the figures of merit that should be explicitly reported when presenting a device's separation capabilities. Ultimately, reporting the relevant figures of merit will benefit this growing community and help pave the road toward commercialization of these microfluidic systems.

Citing Articles

Rapid Construction of Liquid-like Surfaces via Single-Cycle Polymer Brush Grafting for Enhanced Antifouling in Microfluidic Systems.

Wu F, Xu J, Liu Y, Sun H, Zhang L, Liu Y Micromachines (Basel). 2024; 15(10).

PMID: 39459115 PMC: 11509447. DOI: 10.3390/mi15101241.

References
1.
Honrado C, Bisegna P, Swami N, Caselli F . Single-cell microfluidic impedance cytometry: from raw signals to cell phenotypes using data analytics. Lab Chip. 2020; 21(1):22-54. PMC: 7909465. DOI: 10.1039/d0lc00840k. View

2.
Tseng C, Lu S, Chen S, Wang J, Fu L, Wu Y . Microfluidic aptasensor POC device for determination of whole blood potassium. Anal Chim Acta. 2022; 1203:339722. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2022.339722. View

3.
Wu M, Huang P, Zhang R, Mao Z, Chen C, Kemeny G . Circulating Tumor Cell Phenotyping via High-Throughput Acoustic Separation. Small. 2018; 14(32):e1801131. PMC: 6105522. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201801131. View

4.
Tomlinson M, Tomlinson S, Yang X, Kirkham J . Cell separation: Terminology and practical considerations. J Tissue Eng. 2013; 4:2041731412472690. PMC: 3578272. DOI: 10.1177/2041731412472690. View

5.
Lu N, Tay H, Petchakup C, He L, Gong L, Maw K . Label-free microfluidic cell sorting and detection for rapid blood analysis. Lab Chip. 2023; 23(5):1226-1257. DOI: 10.1039/d2lc00904h. View