» Articles » PMID: 37862357

CONcreTEXT Norms: Concreteness Ratings for Italian and English Words in Context

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Oct 20
PMID 37862357
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Concreteness is a fundamental dimension of word semantic representation that has attracted more and more interest to become one of the most studied variables in the psycholinguistic and cognitive neuroscience literature in the last decade. Concreteness effects have been found at both the brain and the behavioral levels, but they may vary depending on the constraints of the context and task demands. In this study, we collected concreteness norms for English and Italian words presented in different context sentences to allow better control and manipulation of concreteness in future psycholinguistic research. First, we observed high split-half correlations and Cronbach's alpha coefficients, suggesting that our ratings were highly reliable and can be used in Italian- and English-speaking populations. Second, our data indicate that the concreteness ratings are related to the lexical density and accessibility of the sentence in both English and Italian. We also found that the concreteness of words in isolation was highly correlated with that of words in context. Finally, we analyzed differences between nouns and verbs in concreteness ratings without significant effects. Our new concreteness norms of words in context are a valuable source of information for future research in both the English and Italian language. The complete database is available on the Open Science Framework (doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U3PC4).

Citing Articles

Specificity ratings for English data.

Ravelli A, Bolognesi M, Caselli T Cogn Process. 2024; .

PMID: 39514144 DOI: 10.1007/s10339-024-01239-4.


What we mean when we say semantic: Toward a multidisciplinary semantic glossary.

Reilly J, Shain C, Borghesani V, Kuhnke P, Vigliocco G, Peelle J Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 32(1):243-280.

PMID: 39231896 PMC: 11836185. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7.

References
1.
Muraki E, Abdalla S, Brysbaert M, Pexman P . Concreteness ratings for 62,000 English multiword expressions. Behav Res Methods. 2022; 55(5):2522-2531. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01912-6. View

2.
Cardillo E, Watson C, Chatterjee A . Stimulus needs are a moving target: 240 additional matched literal and metaphorical sentences for testing neural hypotheses about metaphor. Behav Res Methods. 2016; 49(2):471-483. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0717-1. View

3.
Cardillo E, Schmidt G, Kranjec A, Chatterjee A . Stimulus design is an obstacle course: 560 matched literal and metaphorical sentences for testing neural hypotheses about metaphor. Behav Res Methods. 2010; 42(3):651-64. PMC: 2952404. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.651. View

4.
Miller L, Roodenrys S . The interaction of word frequency and concreteness in immediate serial recall. Mem Cognit. 2009; 37(6):850-65. DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.6.850. View

5.
Hoffman P, Lambon Ralph M, Rogers T . Semantic diversity: a measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words. Behav Res Methods. 2012; 45(3):718-30. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x. View