» Articles » PMID: 29915011

Interoception: the Forgotten Modality in Perceptual Grounding of Abstract and Concrete Concepts

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Jun 20
PMID 29915011
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conceptual representations are perceptually grounded, but when investigating which perceptual modalities are involved, researchers have typically restricted their consideration to vision, touch, hearing, taste and smell. However, there is another major modality of perceptual information that is distinct from these traditional five senses; that is, interoception, or sensations inside the body. In this paper, we use megastudy data (modality-specific ratings of perceptual strength for over 32 000 words) to explore how interoceptive information contributes to the perceptual grounding of abstract and concrete concepts. We report how interoceptive strength captures a distinct form of perceptual experience across the abstract-concrete spectrum, but is markedly more important to abstract concepts (e.g. , ) than to concrete concepts (e.g. , ). In particular, interoception dominates emotion concepts, especially negative emotions relating to and , moreso than other concepts of equivalent abstractness and valence. Finally, we examine whether interoceptive strength represents valuable information in conceptual content by investigating its role in concreteness effects in word recognition, and find that it enhances semantic facilitation over and above the traditional five sensory modalities. Overall, these findings suggest that interoception has comparable status to other modalities in contributing to the perceptual grounding of abstract and concrete concepts.This article is part of the theme issue 'Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain'.

Citing Articles

Digital connection, real bonding: Brief online chats boost interpersonal closeness regardless of the conversational topic.

Fini C, Era V, Cuomo G, Falcinelli I, Gervasi M, Candidi M Heliyon. 2025; 11(4):e42526.

PMID: 40028546 PMC: 11869026. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42526.


A Linguistic-Sensorimotor Model of the Basic-Level Advantage in Category Verification.

Wingfield C, van Hoef R, Connell L Cogn Sci. 2024; 48(12):e70025.

PMID: 39715230 PMC: 11666073. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.70025.


What we mean when we say semantic: Toward a multidisciplinary semantic glossary.

Reilly J, Shain C, Borghesani V, Kuhnke P, Vigliocco G, Peelle J Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 32(1):243-280.

PMID: 39231896 PMC: 11836185. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7.


Invariant representations in abstract concept grounding - the physical world in grounded cognition.

Friedrich J, Fischer M, Raab M Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 31(6):2558-2580.

PMID: 38806790 PMC: 11680661. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02522-3.


Conceptual structure of emotions.

Kelly A, Kenett Y, Medaglia J, Reilly J, Dudhat P, Chrysikou E Emotion. 2024; 24(6):1550-1561.

PMID: 38635194 PMC: 11833677. DOI: 10.1037/emo0001327.


References
1.
Connell L, Lynott D . Modality switching costs emerge in concept creation as well as retrieval. Cogn Sci. 2011; 35(4):763-78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01168.x. View

2.
Connell L, Lynott D . Principles of representation: why you can't represent the same concept twice. Top Cogn Sci. 2014; 6(3):390-406. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12097. View

3.
Schandry R . Heart beat perception and emotional experience. Psychophysiology. 1981; 18(4):483-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb02486.x. View

4.
Lynott D, Connell L . Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: the relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form. Behav Res Methods. 2012; 45(2):516-26. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0267-0. View

5.
Pecher D, Zeelenberg R, Barsalou L . Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs. Psychol Sci. 2003; 14(2):119-24. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01429. View