Clustering, Hierarchical Organization, and the Topography of Abstract and Concrete Nouns

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2014 May 9

PMID 24808876

Citations 43

Authors

Joshua Troche

Sebastian Crutch

Jamie Reilly

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The empirical study of language has historically relied heavily upon concrete word stimuli. By definition, concrete words evoke salient perceptual associations that fit well within feature-based, sensorimotor models of word meaning. In contrast, many theorists argue that abstract words are "disembodied" in that their meaning is mediated through language. We investigated word meaning as distributed in multidimensional space using hierarchical cluster analysis. Participants (N = 365) rated target words (n = 400 English nouns) across 12 cognitive dimensions (e.g., polarity, ease of teaching, emotional valence). Factor reduction revealed three latent factors, corresponding roughly to perceptual salience, affective association, and magnitude. We plotted the original 400 words for the three latent factors. Abstract and concrete words showed overlap in their topography but also differentiated themselves in semantic space. This topographic approach to word meaning offers a unique perspective to word concreteness.

Citing Articles

The Flexible Role of Social Experience in the Processing of Abstract Concepts.

Yao Z, Chai Y, He X Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40001821 PMC: 11851493. DOI: 10.3390/bs15020190.

Semantic processing in older adults is associated with distributed neural activation which varies by association and abstractness of words.

Garcia A, Cohen R, Langer K, ONeal A, Porges E, Woods A Geroscience. 2024; 46(6):6195-6212.

PMID: 38822124 PMC: 11493883. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-024-01216-x.

TACO: A Turkish database for abstract concepts.

Conca F, Gibbons D, Bayram B, Incesoy E, Tacchini M, Duzel E Behav Res Methods. 2024; 56(7):7427-7439.

PMID: 38684624 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02428-x.

CONcreTEXT norms: Concreteness ratings for Italian and English words in context.

Montefinese M, Gregori L, Ravelli A, Varvara R, Radicioni D PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0293031.

PMID: 37862357 PMC: 10588859. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293031.

Brain Signatures of Embodied Semantics and Language: A Consensus Paper.

Bechtold L, Cosper S, Malyshevskaya A, Montefinese M, Morucci P, Niccolai V J Cogn. 2023; 6(1):61.

PMID: 37841669 PMC: 10573703. DOI: 10.5334/joc.237.

References

Gathercole V . 'He has too much hard questions': the acquisition of the linguistic mass-count distinction in much and many. J Child Lang. 1985; 12(2):395-415. View

Walsh V . A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003; 7(11):483-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002. View

Garrard P, Lambon Ralph M, Patterson K, Pratt K, Hodges J . Semantic feature knowledge and picture naming in dementia of Alzheimer's type: a new approach. Brain Lang. 2005; 93(1):79-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.08.003. View

Connell L, Lynott D . Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability. Cognition. 2012; 125(3):452-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.010. View

Rogers T, Lambon Ralph M, Garrard P, Bozeat S, McClelland J, Hodges J . Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychol Rev. 2004; 111(1):205-35. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.205. View

Reilly J, Chrysikou E, Ramey C . Support for hybrid models of the age of acquisition of English nouns. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008; 14(6):1164-70. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193107. View

Garrard P, Ralph M, Hodges J, Patterson K . Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010; 18(2):125-74. DOI: 10.1080/02643290125857. View

Gibb W, Luthert P, Marsden C . Corticobasal degeneration. Brain. 1989; 112 ( Pt 5):1171-92. DOI: 10.1093/brain/112.5.1171. View

Barsalou L . Perceptual symbol systems. Behav Brain Sci. 2001; 22(4):577-609; discussion 610-60. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x99002149. View

10.

Crutch S, Lehmann M, Schott J, Rabinovici G, Rossor M, Fox N . Posterior cortical atrophy. Lancet Neurol. 2012; 11(2):170-8. PMC: 3740271. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70289-7. View

11.

Vigliocco G, Kousta S, Della Rosa P, Vinson D, Tettamanti M, Devlin J . The neural representation of abstract words: the role of emotion. Cereb Cortex. 2013; 24(7):1767-77. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht025. View

12.

Crutch S, Warrington E . Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain. 2004; 128(Pt 3):615-27. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh349. View

13.

Kousta S, Vinson D, Vigliocco G . Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition. 2009; 112(3):473-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007. View

14.

Cree G, McRae K . Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003; 132(2):163-201. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.163. View

15.

Zwaan R, Taylor L . Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006; 135(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.1. View

16.

Etkin A, Egner T, Peraza D, Kandel E, Hirsch J . Resolving emotional conflict: a role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala. Neuron. 2006; 51(6):871-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.029. View

17.

Katja Wiemer-Hastings K, Xu X . Content differences for abstract and concrete concepts. Cogn Sci. 2011; 29(5):719-36. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_33. View

18.

Paivio A . Dual coding theory, word abstractness, and emotion: a critical review of Kousta et al. (2011). J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013; 142(1):282-7. DOI: 10.1037/a0027004. View

19.

Cree G, McNorgan C, McRae K . Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006; 32(4):643-58. PMC: 3226832. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.643. View

20.

Bonner M, Vesely L, Price C, Anderson C, Richmond L, Farag C . Reversal of the concreteness effect in semantic dementia. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010; 26(6):568-79. PMC: 2918518. DOI: 10.1080/02643290903512305. View