» Articles » PMID: 30294932

Modeling the Structure and Dynamics of Semantic Processing

Overview
Journal Cogn Sci
Specialty Psychology
Date 2018 Oct 9
PMID 30294932
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The contents and structure of semantic memory have been the focus of much recent research, with major advances in the development of distributional models, which use word co-occurrence information as a window into the semantics of language. In parallel, connectionist modeling has extended our knowledge of the processes engaged in semantic activation. However, these two lines of investigation have rarely been brought together. Here, we describe a processing model based on distributional semantics in which activation spreads throughout a semantic network, as dictated by the patterns of semantic similarity between words. We show that the activation profile of the network, measured at various time points, can successfully account for response times in lexical and semantic decision tasks, as well as for subjective concreteness and imageability ratings. We also show that the dynamics of the network is predictive of performance in relational semantic tasks, such as similarity/relatedness rating. Our results indicate that bringing together distributional semantic networks and spreading of activation provides a good fit to both automatic lexical processing (as indexed by lexical and semantic decisions) as well as more deliberate processing (as indexed by ratings), above and beyond what has been reported for previous models that take into account only similarity resulting from network structure.

Citing Articles

Cracking arbitrariness: A data-driven study of auditory iconicity in spoken English.

de Varda A, Marelli M Psychon Bull Rev. 2025; .

PMID: 39779657 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02630-0.


CONcreTEXT norms: Concreteness ratings for Italian and English words in context.

Montefinese M, Gregori L, Ravelli A, Varvara R, Radicioni D PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0293031.

PMID: 37862357 PMC: 10588859. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293031.


Brain Signatures of Embodied Semantics and Language: A Consensus Paper.

Bechtold L, Cosper S, Malyshevskaya A, Montefinese M, Morucci P, Niccolai V J Cogn. 2023; 6(1):61.

PMID: 37841669 PMC: 10573703. DOI: 10.5334/joc.237.


Towards a unifying theory of linguistic meaning.

Mondal P Commun Integr Biol. 2023; 16(1):2200666.

PMID: 37123449 PMC: 10134947. DOI: 10.1080/19420889.2023.2200666.


Computational Models of Readers' Apperceptive Mass.

Jacobs A, Kinder A Front Artif Intell. 2022; 5:718690.

PMID: 35280232 PMC: 8905622. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2022.718690.


References
1.
Pexman P, Hargreaves I, Siakaluk P, Bodner G, Pope J . There are many ways to be rich: effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008; 15(1):161-7. DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.161. View

2.
Bullinaria J, Levy J . Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: stop-lists, stemming, and SVD. Behav Res Methods. 2012; 44(3):890-907. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0183-8. View

3.
McClelland J, Botvinick M, Noelle D, Plaut D, Rogers T, Seidenberg M . Letting structure emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010; 14(8):348-56. PMC: 3056446. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.002. View

4.
Hargreaves I, Pexman P . Get rich quick: the signal to respond procedure reveals the time course of semantic richness effects during visual word recognition. Cognition. 2014; 131(2):216-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.01.001. View

5.
Roelofs A . A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition. 1992; 42(1-3):107-42. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-f. View