» Articles » PMID: 37788980

Retracing the Evolution of a Modern Periplasmic Binding Protein

Overview
Journal Protein Sci
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2023 Oct 3
PMID 37788980
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Investigating the evolution of structural features in modern multidomain proteins helps to understand their immense diversity and functional versatility. The class of periplasmic binding proteins (PBPs) offers an opportunity to interrogate one of the main processes driving diversification: the duplication and fusion of protein sequences to generate new architectures. The symmetry of their two-lobed topology, their mechanism of binding, and the organization of their operon structure led to the hypothesis that PBPs arose through a duplication and fusion event of a single common ancestor. To investigate this claim, we set out to reverse the evolutionary process and recreate the structural equivalent of a single-lobed progenitor using ribose-binding protein (RBP) as our model. We found that this modern PBP can be deconstructed into its lobes, producing two proteins that represent possible progenitor halves. The isolated halves of RBP are well folded and monomeric proteins, albeit with a lower thermostability, and do not retain the original binding function. However, the two entities readily form a heterodimer in vitro and in-cell. The x-ray structure of the heterodimer closely resembles the parental protein. Moreover, the binding function is fully regained upon formation of the heterodimer with a ligand affinity similar to that observed in the modern RBP. This highlights how a duplication event could have given rise to a stable and functional PBP-like fold and provides insights into how more complex functional structures can evolve from simpler molecular components.

Citing Articles

Retracing the evolution of a modern periplasmic binding protein.

Michel F, Romero-Romero S, Hocker B Protein Sci. 2023; 32(11):e4793.

PMID: 37788980 PMC: 10601554. DOI: 10.1002/pro.4793.

References
1.
Gabadinho J, Beteva A, Guijarro M, Rey-Bakaikoa V, Spruce D, Bowler M . MxCuBE: a synchrotron beamline control environment customized for macromolecular crystallography experiments. J Synchrotron Radiat. 2010; 17(5):700-7. PMC: 3025540. DOI: 10.1107/S0909049510020005. View

2.
Bermejo G, Strub M, Ho C, Tjandra N . Determination of the solution-bound conformation of an amino acid binding protein by NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement: use of a single flexible paramagnetic probe with improved estimation of its sampling space. J Am Chem Soc. 2009; 131(27):9532-7. PMC: 2720827. DOI: 10.1021/ja902436g. View

3.
Michel F, Shanmugaratnam S, Romero-Romero S, Hocker B . Structures of permuted halves of a modern ribose-binding protein. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2023; 79(Pt 1):40-49. PMC: 9815098. DOI: 10.1107/S205979832201186X. View

4.
Prajapati R, Indu S, Varadarajan R . Identification and thermodynamic characterization of molten globule states of periplasmic binding proteins. Biochemistry. 2007; 46(36):10339-52. DOI: 10.1021/bi700577m. View

5.
Careaga C, Sutherland J, Sabeti J, Falke J . Large amplitude twisting motions of an interdomain hinge: a disulfide trapping study of the galactose-glucose binding protein. Biochemistry. 1995; 34(9):3048-55. PMC: 2892987. DOI: 10.1021/bi00009a036. View