» Articles » PMID: 37040407

Expansion of the Sagittal Suture Induces Proliferation of Skeletal Stem Cells and Sustains Endogenous Calvarial Bone Regeneration

Abstract

In newborn humans, and up to approximately 2 y of age, calvarial bone defects can naturally regenerate. This remarkable regeneration potential is also found in newborn mice and is absent in adult mice. Since previous studies showed that the mouse calvarial sutures are reservoirs of calvarial skeletal stem cells (cSSCs), which are the cells responsible for calvarial bone regeneration, here we hypothesized that the regenerative potential of the newborn mouse calvaria is due to a significant amount of cSSCs present in the newborn expanding sutures. Thus, we tested whether such regenerative potential can be reverse engineered in adult mice by artificially inducing an increase of the cSSCs resident within the adult calvarial sutures. First, we analyzed the cellular composition of the calvarial sutures in newborn and in older mice, up to 14-mo-old mice, showing that the sutures of the younger mice are enriched in cSSCs. Then, we demonstrated that a controlled mechanical expansion of the functionally closed sagittal sutures of adult mice induces a significant increase of the cSSCs. Finally, we showed that if a calvarial critical size bone defect is created simultaneously to the mechanical expansion of the sagittal suture, it fully regenerates without the need for additional therapeutic aids. Using a genetic blockade system, we further demonstrate that this endogenous regeneration is mediated by the canonical Wnt signaling. This study shows that controlled mechanical forces can harness the cSSCs and induce calvarial bone regeneration. Similar harnessing strategies may be used to develop novel and more effective bone regeneration autotherapies.

Citing Articles

The application of tissue engineering strategies for uterine regeneration.

Chen S, Yoo J, Wang M Mater Today Bio. 2025; 31:101594.

PMID: 40070871 PMC: 11894340. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101594.


New Frontiers in Craniofacial Surgery - Harnessing Nature's Healing Power.

Balaji S Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2025; 14(2):127.

PMID: 39957866 PMC: 11828052. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_185_24.


The Mohawk homeobox gene represents a marker and osteo-inhibitory factor in calvarial suture osteoprogenitor cells.

Wang Y, Qin Q, Wang Z, Negri S, Sono T, Tower R Cell Death Dis. 2024; 15(6):420.

PMID: 38886383 PMC: 11183145. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-024-06813-4.


Biomaterials for Regenerative Cranioplasty: Current State of Clinical Application and Future Challenges.

He L J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(4).

PMID: 38667541 PMC: 11050949. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15040084.


[Advances in Molecular Regulatory Mechanisms of Jaw Repair and Reconstruction].

Du X, Xie J, Zou L Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024; 55(1):224-229.

PMID: 38322535 PMC: 10839496. DOI: 10.12182/20240160101.


References
1.
Grova M, Lo D, Montoro D, Hyun J, Chung M, Wan D . Models of cranial suture biology. J Craniofac Surg. 2012; 23(7 Suppl 1):1954-8. PMC: 4126807. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318258ba53. View

2.
Wang X, Luo E, Bi R, Ye B, Hu J, Zou S . Wnt/β-catenin signaling is required for distraction osteogenesis in rats. Connect Tissue Res. 2017; 59(1):45-54. DOI: 10.1080/03008207.2017.1300154. View

3.
Farmer D, Mlcochova H, Zhou Y, Koelling N, Wang G, Ashley N . The developing mouse coronal suture at single-cell resolution. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):4797. PMC: 8355337. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24917-9. View

4.
Morriss-Kay G, Wilkie A . Growth of the normal skull vault and its alteration in craniosynostosis: insights from human genetics and experimental studies. J Anat. 2005; 207(5):637-53. PMC: 1571561. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00475.x. View

5.
Holmes G . The role of vertebrate models in understanding craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012; 28(9):1471-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-012-1844-3. View