» Articles » PMID: 31353299

Factors Related to Failure of Autologous Cranial Reconstructions After Decompressive Craniectomy

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2019 Jul 30
PMID 31353299
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Cranioplasty is customary after decompressive craniectomy. Many different materials have been developed and used for this procedure. The ideal material does not yet exist, while complication rates in cranioplasties remain high. This study aimed to determine factors related to autologous bone flap failure.

Materials And Methods: In this two-center retrospective cohort study, 276 patients underwent autologous bone cranioplasty after initial decompressive craniectomy between 2004 and 2014. Medical records were reviewed regarding patient characteristics and factors potentially related to bone flap failure. Data were analyzed using univariable and multivariable regression analysis.

Results: Independent factors related to overall bone flap failure were: duration of hospitalization after decompressive craniectomy [OR: 1.012 (95%CI: 1.003-1.022); p = 0.012], time interval between decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty [OR: 1.018 (95%CI: 1.004-1.032); p = 0.013], and follow-up duration [OR: 1.034 (95%CI: 1.020-1.047); p < 0.001]. In patients with bone flap infection, neoplasm as initial diagnosis occurred significantly more often (29.2% vs. 7.8%; RD 21.3%; 95%CI 8.4 -38.3%; NNH 5; 95%CI 3 -12) and duration of hospitalization after decompressive craniectomy tended to be longer (means 54 vs. 28 days, MD 26.2 days, 95%CI -8.6 to 60.9 days). Patients with bone flap resorption were significantly younger (35 vs. 43 years, MD 7.7 years, 95%CI 0.8-14.6 years) and their cranial defect size tended to be wider than in patients without bone flap resorption (mean circumference 39 vs. 37 cm; MD 2.4 cm, 95% CI -0.43-5.2 cm) and follow-up duration was significantly longer (44 vs. 14 months, MD 29 months, 95%CI 17-42 months).

Conclusion: A neoplasm as initial diagnosis, longer hospitalization after decompressive craniectomy, larger time interval between decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty, and longer follow-up duration are associated with a higher risk of failure of autologous bone flaps for cranioplasty. Patients with these risk factors may be better served with an early recovery program after decompressive surgery or an alloplastic material for cranioplasty.

Citing Articles

Correlation between glymphatic dysfunction and cranial defect in severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective case-control study based on a diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) investigation.

Guo Y, Wu L, Liu J, Liu J, Sun Z Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(9):6756-6766.

PMID: 39281142 PMC: 11400707. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-348.


Decompressive craniectomy in trauma: What you need to know.

Solomou G, Sunny J, Mohan M, Hossain I, Kolias A, Hutchinson P J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024; 97(4):490-496.

PMID: 39137371 PMC: 11446508. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004357.


Complications and Failures of Autologous Heterotopic Cranial Bone versus Alloplastic Cranioplasties.

Oberoi M, Mirzaie S, Huang K, Caprini R, Hu V, Dejam D Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023; 154(4):757e-772e.

PMID: 37749784 PMC: 10963343. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011093.


Expansion of the sagittal suture induces proliferation of skeletal stem cells and sustains endogenous calvarial bone regeneration.

Aldawood Z, Mancinelli L, Geng X, Yeh S, Di Carlo R, C Leite T Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(16):e2120826120.

PMID: 37040407 PMC: 10120053. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2120826120.


Hardness of Artificial Bone and Vulnerability of Reconstructed Skull-A Biomechanical Study.

Nagasao T, Miyanagi T, Wu L, Hatano A, Morotomi T Eplasty. 2023; 22:e41.

PMID: 37035411 PMC: 10078552.