» Articles » PMID: 36964597

Reference Values for Wrist-worn Accelerometer Physical Activity Metrics in England Children and Adolescents

Abstract

Background: Over the last decade use of raw acceleration metrics to assess physical activity has increased. Metrics such as Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO), and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) can be used to generate metrics which describe physical activity volume (average acceleration), intensity distribution (intensity gradient), and intensity of the most active periods (MX metrics) of the day. Presently, relatively little comparative data for these metrics exists in youth. To address this need, this study presents age- and sex-specific reference percentile values in England youth and compares physical activity volume and intensity profiles by age and sex.

Methods: Wrist-worn accelerometer data from 10 studies involving youth aged 5 to 15 y were pooled. Weekday and weekend waking hours were first calculated for youth in school Years (Y) 1&2, Y4&5, Y6&7, and Y8&9 to determine waking hours durations by age-groups and day types. A valid waking hours day was defined as accelerometer wear for ≥ 600 min·d and participants with ≥ 3 valid weekdays and ≥ 1 valid weekend day were included. Mean ENMO- and MAD-generated average acceleration, intensity gradient, and MX metrics were calculated and summarised as weighted week averages. Sex-specific smoothed percentile curves were generated for each metric using Generalized Additive Models for Location Scale and Shape. Linear mixed models examined age and sex differences.

Results: The analytical sample included 1250 participants. Physical activity peaked between ages 6.5-10.5 y, depending on metric. For all metrics the highest activity levels occurred in less active participants (3-50 percentile) and girls, 0.5 to 1.5 y earlier than more active peers, and boys, respectively. Irrespective of metric, boys were more active than girls (p < .001) and physical activity was lowest in the Y8&9 group, particularly when compared to the Y1&2 group (p < .001).

Conclusions: Percentile reference values for average acceleration, intensity gradient, and MX metrics have utility in describing age- and sex-specific values for physical activity volume and intensity in youth. There is a need to generate nationally-representative wrist-acceleration population-referenced norms for these metrics to further facilitate health-related physical activity research and promotion.

Citing Articles

Relative and absolute intensity accelerometer metrics decipher the effects of age, sex, and occupation on physical activity.

Fabian S, Schwendinger F, Raphael K, Knaier R, Jonathan W, Wagner J BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):885.

PMID: 40050804 PMC: 11884089. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21800-w.


The 24-hour movement behaviour compositions of children with and without impaired motor coordination: The Moves-UP project.

Swindell N, Starbuck C, Jin S, Barker H, Thomas G, Rueda-Hernandez J PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0319094.

PMID: 39999192 PMC: 11856484. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319094.


Comment on "Development of an accelerometer age- and sex-specific approach based on population-standardized values for physical activity surveillance: A proof of concept".

Rowlands A, Troiano R J Sport Health Sci. 2024; 14:101004.

PMID: 39490654 PMC: 11863316. DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.101004.


A comparative analysis of 24-hour movement behaviors features using different accelerometer metrics in adults: Implications for guideline compliance and associations with cardiometabolic health.

Willems I, Verbestel V, Dumuid D, Calders P, Lapauw B, De Craemer M PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0309931.

PMID: 39288135 PMC: 11407674. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309931.


Data Analytics in Physical Activity Studies With Accelerometers: Scoping Review.

Liang Y, Wang C, Hsiao C J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e59497.

PMID: 39259962 PMC: 11425027. DOI: 10.2196/59497.


References
1.
Fairclough S, Rowlands A, Taylor S, Boddy L . Cut-point-free accelerometer metrics to assess children's physical activity: An example using the school day. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019; 30(1):117-125. DOI: 10.1111/sms.13565. View

2.
Cairney J, Veldhuizen S, Kwan M, Hay J, Faught B . Biological age and sex-related declines in physical activity during adolescence. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 46(4):730-5. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000168. View

3.
Johnson C, Dohrmann S, Burt V, Mohadjer L . National health and nutrition examination survey: sample design, 2011-2014. Vital Health Stat 2. 2015; (162):1-33. View

4.
Rosenberger M, Fulton J, Buman M, Troiano R, Grandner M, Buchner D . The 24-Hour Activity Cycle: A New Paradigm for Physical Activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018; 51(3):454-464. PMC: 6377291. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001811. View

5.
Freedson P, John D . Comment on "estimating activity and sedentary behavior from an accelerometer on the hip and wrist". Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 45(5):962-3. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31827f024d. View