Relative and Absolute Intensity Accelerometer Metrics Decipher the Effects of Age, Sex, and Occupation on Physical Activity

Overview

Journal BMC Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2025 Mar 6

PMID 40050804

Authors

Schwendinger Fabian

Fabian Schwendinger

Raphael Knaier

Knaier Raphael

Jonathan Wagner

Wagner Jonathan

Denis Infanger

Infanger Denis

Lichtenstein Eric

Eric Lichtenstein

Hinrichs Timo

Timo Hinrichs

Alex Rowlands

Rowlands Alex

Arno Schmidt-Trucksass

Schmidt-Trucksass Arno

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: To investigate whether quantifying both the absolute and relative intensity of physical activity (PA) improves understanding of age, sex, and occupation-related differences in PA in healthy adults aged 20-89.

Methods: In the cross-sectional COmPLETE study, participants (N = 460, 48% women, age 55 [IQR 37, 71]) wore accelerometers for up to 14 days and underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Average acceleration (AvAcc) and distribution of intensity (IG) of PA across the day were expressed in absolute terms (_) and relative (_) to the acceleration at the individual´s maximum intensity, predicted from cardiorespiratory fitness.

Results: After initial increases, AvAcc_ and IG_ continuously declined beyond age 40-45, whereas AvAcc_ and IG_ increased until stabilising at age ~ 70 and declining at age ~ 60, respectively. Cardiorespiratory fitness constantly declined. Women had trivially higher AvAcc_ and moderately higher AvAcc_, but not IG_ and IG, than men. Occupations involving at least moderate PA showed higher AvAcc_ and AvAcc_, but not IG_ and IG indicating longer periods of low-intensity PA, compared to sitting/standing occupations.

Conclusions: Distinct age trajectories of absolute and relative metrics as well as cardiorespiratory fitness suggest that the age-related decline in the latter preceded that of PA. Women's higher AvAcc_ and AvAcc_ relate to more low-intensity PA combined with lower cardiorespiratory fitness rather than more health-enhancing higher-intensity PA. Finally, the intensity profile of occupational PA may provide insight into why occupational PA appears to lack a prophylactic association with health. Quantifying both the absolute and relative intensity of accelerometer-assessed PA provides greater insight than either alone.

Trial Registration: On clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03986892). Retrospectively registered 14 June 2019.

References

Wagner J, Knaier R, Infanger D, Konigstein K, Klenk C, Carrard J . Novel CPET Reference Values in Healthy Adults: Associations with Physical Activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020; 53(1):26-37. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002454. View

Fairclough S, Rowlands A, Del Pozo Cruz B, Crotti M, Foweather L, Graves L . Reference values for wrist-worn accelerometer physical activity metrics in England children and adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023; 20(1):35. PMC: 10039565. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-023-01435-z. View

Dempsey P, Rowlands A, Strain T, Zaccardi F, Dawkins N, Razieh C . Physical activity volume, intensity, and incident cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2022; 43(46):4789-4800. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac613. View

Dawkins N, Yates T, Edwardson C, Maylor B, Henson J, Hall A . Importance of Overall Activity and Intensity of Activity for Cardiometabolic Risk in Those with and Without a Chronic Disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022; 54(9):1582-1590. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002939. View

Rowlands A, Fairclough S, Yates T, Edwardson C, Davies M, Munir F . Activity Intensity, Volume, and Norms: Utility and Interpretation of Accelerometer Metrics. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019; 51(11):2410-2422. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002047. View

Rowlands A, Edwardson C, Davies M, Khunti K, Harrington D, Yates T . Beyond Cut Points: Accelerometer Metrics that Capture the Physical Activity Profile. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018; 50(6):1323-1332. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001561. View

Schwendinger F, Wagner J, Knaier R, Infanger D, Rowlands A, Hinrichs T . Accelerometer Metrics: Healthy Adult Reference Values, Associations with Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Clinical Implications. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023; 56(2):170-180. PMC: 11882184. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003299. View

Migueles J, Molina-Garcia P, Torres-Lopez L, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Rowlands A, Ebner-Priemer U . Equivalency of four research-grade movement sensors to assess movement behaviors and its implications for population surveillance. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):5525. PMC: 8975935. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09469-2. View

Orme M, Lloyd-Evans P, Jayamaha A, Katagira W, Kirenga B, Pina I . A Case for Unifying Accelerometry-Derived Movement Behaviors and Tests of Exercise Capacity for the Assessment of Relative Physical Activity Intensity. J Phys Act Health. 2023; 20(4):303-310. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2022-0590. View

Rowlands A, Orme M, Maylor B, Kingsnorth A, Herring L, Khunti K . Can quantifying the relative intensity of a person's free-living physical activity predict how they respond to a physical activity intervention? Findings from the PACES RCT. Br J Sports Med. 2023; 57(22):1428-1434. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-106953. View

10.

Wanner M, Hartmann C, Pestoni G, Martin B, Siegrist M, Martin-Diener E . Validation of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire for self-administration in a European context. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017; 3(1):e000206. PMC: 5530095. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2016-000206. View

11.

Guo W, Key T, Reeves G . Accelerometer compared with questionnaire measures of physical activity in relation to body size and composition: a large cross-sectional analysis of UK Biobank. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(1):e024206. PMC: 6352868. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024206. View

12.

Troiano R, McClain J, Brychta R, Chen K . Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research. Br J Sports Med. 2014; 48(13):1019-23. PMC: 4141534. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093546. View

13.

Holtermann A, Krause N, van der Beek A, Straker L . The physical activity paradox: six reasons why occupational physical activity (OPA) does not confer the cardiovascular health benefits that leisure time physical activity does. Br J Sports Med. 2017; 52(3):149-150. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097965. View

14.

Cillekens B, Huysmans M, Holtermann A, van Mechelen W, Straker L, Krause N . Physical activity at work may not be health enhancing. A systematic review with meta-analysis on the association between occupational physical activity and cardiovascular disease mortality covering 23 studies with 655 892 participants. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021; 48(2):86-98. PMC: 9045238. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3993. View

15.

Wagner J, Knaier R, Infanger D, Arbeev K, Briel M, Dieterle T . Functional aging in health and heart failure: the COmPLETE Study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019; 19(1):180. PMC: 6664502. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-019-1164-6. View

16.

Anderson L, Erceg D, Schroeder E . Utility of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance compared with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for assessment of total and regional body composition varies between men and women. Nutr Res. 2012; 32(7):479-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2012.05.009. View

17.

McLESTER C, Nickerson B, Kliszczewicz B, McLESTER J . Reliability and Agreement of Various InBody Body Composition Analyzers as Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Healthy Men and Women. J Clin Densitom. 2018; 23(3):443-450. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.10.008. View

18.

Baumeister S, Ricci C, Kohler S, Fischer B, Topfer C, Finger J . Physical activity surveillance in the European Union: reliability and validity of the European Health Interview Survey-Physical Activity Questionnaire (EHIS-PAQ). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016; 13:61. PMC: 4877949. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-016-0386-6. View

19.

Midgley A, Bentley D, Luttikholt H, McNaughton L, Millet G . Challenging a dogma of exercise physiology: does an incremental exercise test for valid VO 2 max determination really need to last between 8 and 12 minutes?. Sports Med. 2008; 38(6):441-7. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200838060-00001. View