» Articles » PMID: 36952562

Mitochondrial Network Structure Controls Cell-to-cell MtDNA Variability Generated by Cell Divisions

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Mar 23
PMID 36952562
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mitochondria are highly dynamic organelles, containing vital populations of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) distributed throughout the cell. Mitochondria form diverse physical structures in different cells, from cell-wide reticulated networks to fragmented individual organelles. These physical structures are known to influence the genetic makeup of mtDNA populations between cell divisions, but their influence on the inheritance of mtDNA at divisions remains less understood. Here, we use statistical and computational models of mtDNA content inside and outside the reticulated network to quantify how mitochondrial network structure can control the variances of inherited mtDNA copy number and mutant load. We assess the use of moment-based approximations to describe heteroplasmy variance and identify several cases where such an approach has shortcomings. We show that biased inclusion of one mtDNA type in the network can substantially increase heteroplasmy variance (acting as a genetic bottleneck), and controlled distribution of network mass and mtDNA through the cell can conversely reduce heteroplasmy variance below a binomial inheritance picture. Network structure also allows the generation of heteroplasmy variance while controlling copy number inheritance to sub-binomial levels, reconciling several observations from the experimental literature. Overall, different network structures and mtDNA arrangements within them can control the variances of key variables to suit a palette of different inheritance priorities.

Citing Articles

Real-time assessment of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy dynamics at the single-cell level.

Roussou R, Metzler D, Padovani F, Thoma F, Schwarz R, Shraiman B EMBO J. 2024; 43(22):5340-5359.

PMID: 39103491 PMC: 11574196. DOI: 10.1038/s44318-024-00183-5.


Evolution and maintenance of mtDNA gene content across eukaryotes.

Veeraragavan S, Johansen M, Johnston I Biochem J. 2024; 481(15):1015-1042.

PMID: 39101615 PMC: 11346449. DOI: 10.1042/BCJ20230415.


Mechanisms and pathologies of human mitochondrial DNA replication and deletion formation.

Bernardino Gomes T, Vincent A, Menger K, Stewart J, Nicholls T Biochem J. 2024; 481(11):683-715.

PMID: 38804971 PMC: 11346376. DOI: 10.1042/BCJ20230262.


Spontaneous Mutations in mtDNA Increase Cell-to-Cell Variation in mtDNA Amount.

Potapenko E, Kashko N, Knorre D Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(24).

PMID: 38139242 PMC: 10743915. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242417413.


Mitochondrial networks through the lens of mathematics.

Lewis G, Marshall W Phys Biol. 2023; 20(5).

PMID: 37290456 PMC: 10347554. DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/acdcdb.


References
1.
Floros V, Pyle A, Dietmann S, Wei W, Tang W, Irie N . Segregation of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy through a developmental genetic bottleneck in human embryos. Nat Cell Biol. 2018; 20(2):144-151. PMC: 6551220. DOI: 10.1038/s41556-017-0017-8. View

2.
Tam Z, Gruber J, Halliwell B, Gunawan R . Context-Dependent Role of Mitochondrial Fusion-Fission in Clonal Expansion of mtDNA Mutations. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015; 11(5):e1004183. PMC: 4440705. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004183. View

3.
Johnston I . Varied Mechanisms and Models for the Varying Mitochondrial Bottleneck. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019; 7:294. PMC: 6879659. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00294. View

4.
Burr S, Pezet M, Chinnery P . Mitochondrial DNA Heteroplasmy and Purifying Selection in the Mammalian Female Germ Line. Dev Growth Differ. 2018; 60(1):21-32. PMC: 11520955. DOI: 10.1111/dgd.12420. View

5.
Stewart J, Freyer C, Elson J, Wredenberg A, Cansu Z, Trifunovic A . Strong purifying selection in transmission of mammalian mitochondrial DNA. PLoS Biol. 2008; 6(1):e10. PMC: 2214808. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060010. View