The Spatial Landscape of Gene Expression Isoforms in Tissue Sections

Overview

Journal Nucleic Acids Res

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Biochemistry

Date 2023 Mar 17

PMID 36928528

Authors

Kevin Lebrigand

Joseph Bergenstrahle

Kim Thrane

Annelie Mollbrink

Konstantinos Meletis

Pascal Barbry

Rainer Waldmann

Joakim Lundeberg

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In situ capturing technologies add tissue context to gene expression data, with the potential of providing a greater understanding of complex biological systems. However, splicing variants and full-length sequence heterogeneity cannot be characterized at spatial resolution with current transcriptome profiling methods. To that end, we introduce spatial isoform transcriptomics (SiT), an explorative method for characterizing spatial isoform variation and sequence heterogeneity using long-read sequencing. We show in mouse brain how SiT can be used to profile isoform expression and sequence heterogeneity in different areas of the tissue. SiT reveals regional isoform switching of Plp1 gene between different layers of the olfactory bulb, and the use of external single-cell data allows the nomination of cell types expressing each isoform. Furthermore, SiT identifies differential isoform usage for several major genes implicated in brain function (Snap25, Bin1, Gnas) that are independently validated by in situ sequencing. SiT also provides for the first time an in-depth A-to-I RNA editing map of the adult mouse brain. Data exploration can be performed through an online resource (https://www.isomics.eu), where isoform expression and RNA editing can be visualized in a spatial context.

Citing Articles

A systematic benchmark of Nanopore long-read RNA sequencing for transcript-level analysis in human cell lines.

Chen Y, Davidson N, Kei Wan Y, Yao F, Su Y, Gamaarachchi H Nat Methods. 2025; .

PMID: 40082608 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-025-02623-4.

Application of Spatial Transcriptomics in Digestive System Tumors.

Huang B, Chen Y, Yuan S Biomolecules. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39858416 PMC: 11761220. DOI: 10.3390/biom15010021.

Spatial transcriptomics in breast cancer: providing insight into tumor heterogeneity and promoting individualized therapy.

An J, Lu Y, Chen Y, Chen Y, Zhou Z, Chen J Front Immunol. 2025; 15:1499301.

PMID: 39749323 PMC: 11693744. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1499301.

Understanding isoform expression by pairing long-read sequencing with single-cell and spatial transcriptomics.

Belchikov N, Hsu J, Li X, Jarroux J, Hu W, Joglekar A Genome Res. 2024; 34(11):1735-1746.

PMID: 39567235 PMC: 11610585. DOI: 10.1101/gr.279640.124.

Integrative spatial and genomic analysis of tumor heterogeneity with Tumoroscope.

Shafighi S, Geras A, Jurzysta B, Sahaf Naeini A, Filipiuk I, Ra Czkowska A Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9343.

PMID: 39472583 PMC: 11522407. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53374-3.

References

Salpietro V, Dixon C, Guo H, Bello O, Vandrovcova J, Efthymiou S . AMPA receptor GluA2 subunit defects are a cause of neurodevelopmental disorders. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):3094. PMC: 6626132. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10910-w. View

Stahl P, Salmen F, Vickovic S, Lundmark A, Fernandez Navarro J, Magnusson J . Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science. 2016; 353(6294):78-82. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf2403. View

Licht K, Kapoor U, Amman F, Picardi E, Martin D, Bajad P . A high resolution A-to-I editing map in the mouse identifies editing events controlled by pre-mRNA splicing. Genome Res. 2019; 29(9):1453-1463. PMC: 6724681. DOI: 10.1101/gr.242636.118. View

Zeisel A, Hochgerner H, Lonnerberg P, Johnsson A, Memic F, van der Zwan J . Molecular Architecture of the Mouse Nervous System. Cell. 2018; 174(4):999-1014.e22. PMC: 6086934. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.021. View

Chen P, Yin J, Guo Y, Xiao H, Wang X, DiSanto M . The expression and functional activities of smooth muscle myosin and non-muscle myosin isoforms in rat prostate. J Cell Mol Med. 2017; 22(1):576-588. PMC: 5742693. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13345. View

Choudhary S, Satija R . Comparison and evaluation of statistical error models for scRNA-seq. Genome Biol. 2022; 23(1):27. PMC: 8764781. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-021-02584-9. View

Wen W, Lin C, Niu L . R/G editing in GluA2R modulates the functional difference between GluA1 flip and flop variants in GluA1/2R heteromeric channels. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):13654. PMC: 5651858. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13233-2. View

Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R . Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat Biotechnol. 2018; 36(5):411-420. PMC: 6700744. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4096. View

Volden R, Palmer T, Byrne A, Cole C, Schmitz R, Green R . Improving nanopore read accuracy with the R2C2 method enables the sequencing of highly multiplexed full-length single-cell cDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(39):9726-9731. PMC: 6166824. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1806447115. View

10.

Bergenstrahle J, Larsson L, Lundeberg J . Seamless integration of image and molecular analysis for spatial transcriptomics workflows. BMC Genomics. 2020; 21(1):482. PMC: 7386244. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-06832-3. View

11.

Hagemann-Jensen M, Ziegenhain C, Chen P, Ramskold D, Hendriks G, Larsson A . Single-cell RNA counting at allele and isoform resolution using Smart-seq3. Nat Biotechnol. 2020; 38(6):708-714. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0497-0. View

12.

Chen A, Liao S, Cheng M, Ma K, Wu L, Lai Y . Spatiotemporal transcriptomic atlas of mouse organogenesis using DNA nanoball-patterned arrays. Cell. 2022; 185(10):1777-1792.e21. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.003. View

13.

Sapiro A, Shmueli A, Henry G, Li Q, Shalit T, Yaron O . Illuminating spatial A-to-I RNA editing signatures within the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(6):2318-2327. PMC: 6369821. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1811768116. View

14.

Liu Y, Yang M, Deng Y, Su G, Enninful A, Guo C . High-Spatial-Resolution Multi-Omics Sequencing via Deterministic Barcoding in Tissue. Cell. 2020; 183(6):1665-1681.e18. PMC: 7736559. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.026. View

15.

Elosua-Bayes M, Nieto P, Mereu E, Gut I, Heyn H . SPOTlight: seeded NMF regression to deconvolute spatial transcriptomics spots with single-cell transcriptomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49(9):e50. PMC: 8136778. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab043. View

16.

Ramaswami G, Li J . RADAR: a rigorously annotated database of A-to-I RNA editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 42(Database issue):D109-13. PMC: 3965033. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt996. View

17.

Rodriques S, Stickels R, Goeva A, Martin C, Murray E, Vanderburg C . Slide-seq: A scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution. Science. 2019; 363(6434):1463-1467. PMC: 6927209. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw1219. View

18.

Baralle F, Giudice J . Alternative splicing as a regulator of development and tissue identity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017; 18(7):437-451. PMC: 6839889. DOI: 10.1038/nrm.2017.27. View

19.

Sunkin S, Ng L, Lau C, Dolbeare T, Gilbert T, Thompson C . Allen Brain Atlas: an integrated spatio-temporal portal for exploring the central nervous system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 41(Database issue):D996-D1008. PMC: 3531093. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks1042. View

20.

Pielawski N, Andersson A, Avenel C, Behanova A, Chelebian E, Klemm A . TissUUmaps 3: Improvements in interactive visualization, exploration, and quality assessment of large-scale spatial omics data. Heliyon. 2023; 9(5):e15306. PMC: 10149187. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15306. View