» Articles » PMID: 36769863

A Standardized Operative Protocol for Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures Using a Locking Plate to Minimize Surgery-Related Complications

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Feb 11
PMID 36769863
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The current literature suggests that up to 55% of complications after plate osteosynthesis treatment for patients with proximal humerus fractures are attributed to the surgical procedure. The hypothesis of this study was that a standardized surgical protocol would minimize surgery-related adverse events. This prospective cohort study included 50 patients with a mean age of 63.2 (range 28-92) years treated by one single surgeon using a previously published standardized surgical protocol. Clinical and radiological follow-up examinations were conducted for up to 24 months using Constant-Murley Score (CS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) and radiographs in true anteroposterior, axial and y-view. Finally, CS was 73.9 (standard deviation [SD]: 14.0) points (89% compared to the uninjured shoulder), and SSV was 83.3% (SD: 16.7) at two years of follow-up. Postoperative radiologic evaluation revealed no primary surgical-related or soft-tissue-related complications (0%). The main complications were secondary, biological complications (20%), largely represented by avascular necrosis (8%). Eight patients underwent revision surgery, mainly for implant removal. In addition, a total of four patients were revised using a hemiarthroplasty (n = 2), reverse shoulder arthroplasty (n = 1) or re-osteosynthesis. The use of our standardized surgical technique on proximal humerus fractures improves fixation with regard to primary stability and prevents primary, surgical-technique-related complications. The subjective grading of a high level of difficulty surgery was associated with more complications.

Citing Articles

A consensus definition of creativity in surgery: A Delphi study protocol.

Thabane A, McKechnie T, Staibano P, Arora V, Calic G, Busse J PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0314445.

PMID: 39636816 PMC: 11620345. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314445.


Intraoperative Doppler flowmetry evaluation of humeral head perfusion after proximal humerus fracture.

Akgun D, Paksoy A, Imiolczyk J, Bahlawane S, Gebauer H, Dey Hazra R JSES Int. 2024; 8(5):990-994.

PMID: 39280151 PMC: 11401537. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.012.


Cyclic Stability of Locking Plate Augmented with Intramedullary Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Strut Fixation for Osteoporotic Humeral Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.

Hsiao C, Chiu Y, Hsiao H, Tsai Y, Lee C, Yen C Life (Basel). 2023; 13(11).

PMID: 38004250 PMC: 10672415. DOI: 10.3390/life13112110.

References
1.
Geiger E, Maier M, Kelm A, Wutzler S, Seebach C, Marzi I . Functional outcome and complications following PHILOS plate fixation in proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010; 44(1):1-6. DOI: 10.3944/AOTT.2010.2270. View

2.
Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S, Saving J, Tidermark J . Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(5):747-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.12.018. View

3.
Fuchs B, Jost B, Gerber C . Posterior-inferior capsular shift for the treatment of recurrent, voluntary posterior subluxation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(1):16-25. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200001000-00003. View

4.
Ranson R, Roller R, Dedhia N, Littlefield C, Konda S, Zuckerman J . No change in outcome ten years following locking plate repair of displaced proximal humerus fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021; 32(6):1195-1200. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-03099-6. View

5.
Schliemann B, Siemoneit J, Theisen C, Kosters C, Weimann A, Raschke M . Complex fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly--outcome and complications after locking plate fixation. Musculoskelet Surg. 2012; 96 Suppl 1:S3-11. DOI: 10.1007/s12306-012-0181-8. View