Intraoperative Doppler Flowmetry Evaluation of Humeral Head Perfusion After Proximal Humerus Fracture

Overview

Journal JSES Int

Date 2024 Sep 16

PMID 39280151

Authors

Doruk Akgun

Alp Paksoy

Jan-Philipp Imiolczyk

Soraya Bahlawane

Henry Gebauer

Rony-Orijit Dey Hazra

Ulrich Stockle

Karl Friedrich Braun

Philipp Moroder

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Understanding vascularity and assessing the risk of post-traumatic avascular necrosis are crucial for predicting outcomes and identifying optimal treatment options in proximal humerus fractures (PHFs). Until now, Hertel et al have been the only researchers to evaluate the intraoperative perfusion of the humeral head after fracture using Doppler flowmetry in a central single drill hole within the head. This pilot study aims to standardize the evaluation of intraoperative perfusion measurements in different areas of the humeral head in patients with PHF.

Methods: In this prospective pilot study, intraoperative semiquantitative Doppler perfusion measurements were conducted during plate osteosynthesis for PHF treatment in our institution between July 2021 and May 2022. The fracture morphology was classified radiologically according to Resch's criteria. Quality of reduction was determined postoperatively to be either anatomical, minor malreduced, or major malreduced according to Peters et al in conventional and computed tomography examinations. Medial hinge integrity and medial metaphyseal extension were assessed radiographically according to Hertel et al. Intraoperatively, after drilling screw holes through the plate, a Doppler probe was inserted through all nine drill holes on the humeral head and at least one on the humeral shaft to successively measure the presence of a pulse to indicate if perfusion is present.

Results: A total of ten patients (mean age 59 years, range, 36-83) with a humeral head fracture (2 × 2GL, 3 × 3G, 2 × 4G, 2 × 4GL, 1 × 5aG according to Resch) were included. Nine of the ten patients showed a pulse signal on the humeral shaft. Overall, pulse-synchronous perfusion was detected using Doppler sonography in at least one hole in the humeral head of all patients. In patients with an intact medial hinge (N = 6), pulse-synchronous perfusion could be measured in almost twice as many humeral head holes on average (5.7 vs. 3.0 drill holes) compared to patients with a dislocated medial hinge (N = 4). In patients with metaphyseal extension (N = 3), pulse-synchronous perfusion was measured in an average of 6.7 humeral head holes compared to 3.7 holes in patients without metaphyseal extension (N = 7).

Conclusion: Semiquantitative, intraoperative Doppler flowmetry offers a noninvasive and rapid assessment of humeral perfusion which allows an understanding of humeral head perfusion, when used in a standardized fashion to measure flow in different areas of the humeral head.

References

Resch H, Povacz P, Frohlich R, Wambacher M . Percutaneous fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997; 79(2):295-300. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b2.6958. View

Dwek J . The periosteum: what is it, where is it, and what mimics it in its absence?. Skeletal Radiol. 2010; 39(4):319-23. PMC: 2826636. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-009-0849-9. View

Martetschlager F, Siebenlist S, Weier M, Sandmann G, Ahrens P, Braun K . Plating of proximal humeral fractures. Orthopedics. 2012; 35(11):e1606-12. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20121023-17. View

Robinson C, Khan L, Akhtar M . Treatment of anterior fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus by open reduction and internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(4):502-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B4.17195. View

Constant C, Gerber C, Emery R, Sojbjerg J, Gohlke F, Boileau P . A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17(2):355-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.022. View

Kwisda S, Imiolczyk J, Imiolczyk T, Werth M, Scheibel M . A Standardized Operative Protocol for Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures Using a Locking Plate to Minimize Surgery-Related Complications. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(3). PMC: 9917760. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12031216. View

Gregory T, Vandenbussche E, Augereau B . Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013; 99(1 Suppl):S197-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.006. View

Roux A, Decroocq L, El Batti S, Bonnevialle N, Moineau G, Trojani C . Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures managed in a trauma center. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012; 98(6):715-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.05.013. View

Brooks C, Revell W, Heatley F . Vascularity of the humeral head after proximal humeral fractures. An anatomical cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993; 75(1):132-6. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B1.8421010. View

10.

Thompson J, Attum B, Rodriguez-Buitrago A, Yusi K, Cereijo C, Obremskey W . Open Reduction and Internal Fixation with a Locking Plate Via Deltopectoral Approach for the Treatment of Three and Four-Part and Proximal Humeral Fractures. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2019; 8(4):e26. PMC: 6358338. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00003. View

11.

Bogner R, Hubner C, Matis N, Auffarth A, Lederer S, Resch H . Minimally-invasive treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(12):1602-7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.20269. View

12.

McLean A, Price N, Graves S, Hatton A, Taylor F . Nationwide trends in management of proximal humeral fractures: an analysis of 77,966 cases from 2008 to 2017. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019; 28(11):2072-2078. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.03.034. View

13.

Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M . Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004; 13(4):427-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.034. View

14.

Tepass A, Blumenstock G, Weise K, Rolauffs B, Bahrs C . Current strategies for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures: an analysis of a survey carried out at 348 hospitals in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 22(1):e8-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.04.002. View

15.

Kirchhoff C, Braunstein V, Kirchhoff S, Sprecher C, Ockert B, Fischer F . Outcome analysis following removal of locking plate fixation of the proximal humerus. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008; 9:138. PMC: 2569939. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-138. View

16.

Boileau P, Pennington S, Alami G . Proximal humeral fractures in younger patients: fixation techniques and arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(2 Suppl):S47-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.12.006. View

17.

Launonen A, Lepola V, Flinkkila T, Strandberg N, Ojanpera J, Rissanen P . Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012; 13:167. PMC: 3520878. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-167. View

18.

Lambert S . Ischaemia, healing and outcomes in proximal humeral fractures. EFORT Open Rev. 2018; 3(5):304-315. PMC: 5994637. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180005. View

19.

Gilbart M, Gerber C . Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16(6):717-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.123. View

20.

Chanavaz M . Anatomy and histophysiology of the periosteum: quantification of the periosteal blood supply to the adjacent bone with 85Sr and gamma spectrometry. J Oral Implantol. 1995; 21(3):214-9. View