» Articles » PMID: 33419012

Fracture-Specific and Conventional Stem Designs in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Acute Proximal Humerus Fractures-A Retrospective, Observational Study

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Jan 9
PMID 33419012
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tuberosity healing and stem design can be outcome-dependent parameters in hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures (PHF). The relevance of fracture-specific stem design in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is still a matter of debate. This retrospective study evaluates tuberosity healing and function for fracture specific stems (A) compared to conventional stems (B) in RSA for complex PHF in 26 patients (w = 21, mean age 73.5 years). Clinically, range of motion (ROM), Constant-Murley-Score (CS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and external rotation lag signs (ERLS) were evaluated. Healing of greater tuberosity (GT) and lesser tuberosity (LT), scapular notching, and loosening were examined radiologically. There were no statistical significant differences with regards to CS (A: 73 ± 11; B: 77 ± 9 points), SSV (A: 78% ± 11%; B: 84% ± 11%), external rotation (A: 18° ± 20°; B: 24° ± 19°), or internal rotation (A: 5.7 ± 2.2; B: 6.7 ± 2.8 CS-points) ( > 0.05). Mean forward flexion was superior for group A ( = 0.036). Consolidation of GT (82%) and LT (73%) was similar in both groups. Anatomical healing was slightly higher in group B ( > 0.05). Scapular notching was found in 27% (A) and 55% (B) ( > 0.05). RSA for PHF provides good to excellent clinical results. The quantitative and qualitative union rate for both cohorts was similar, indicating that fracture stems with open metaphyseal designs to allow for bone ingrowth do not improve tuberosity healing. ERLS correlates with a worse function in CS and ROM in all planes.

Citing Articles

Greater Tuberosity Healing Rate and Clinical Results Following RSA Are Similar for Two Fracture-Specific Implant Systems.

Rotman D, Avraham O, Goldstein Y, Kazum E, Rojas Lievano J, Chechik O J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39598111 PMC: 11595365. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226967.


Mid- to long-term outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as revision procedure for failed hemiarthroplasty after proximal humerus fracture.

Paksoy A, Akgun D, Imiolczyk J, Gebauer H, Lacheta L, Scheibel M BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):752.

PMID: 39304857 PMC: 11414188. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07870-8.


Locked Stem Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Complex Proximal Humerus Fracture in the Elderly: Clinical and Radiological Short-Term Results.

Rivera A, Cardona V J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast. 2024; 8:24715492241266131.

PMID: 39156496 PMC: 11329921. DOI: 10.1177/24715492241266131.


Improved outcomes of older patients with acute and displaced proximal humerus fractures treated with window bone ingrowth fracture-specific stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Claro R, Ribau A, Fonte H, Amorim-Barbosa T, Barros L, Sevivas N BMC Geriatr. 2023; 23(1):553.

PMID: 37700237 PMC: 10498537. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04210-8.


A novel "7 sutures and 8 knots" surgical technique in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: tuberosity healing improves short-term clinical results.

Troiano E, Peri G, Calo I, Colasanti G, Mondanelli N, Giannotti S J Orthop Traumatol. 2023; 24(1):18.

PMID: 37155113 PMC: 10167075. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-023-00697-4.


References
1.
Mata-Fink A, Meinke M, Jones C, Kim B, Bell J . Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older adults: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22(12):1737-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.021. View

2.
Sabesan V, Lombardo D, Petersen-Fitts G, Weisman M, Ramthun K, Whaley J . National trends in proximal humerus fracture treatment patterns. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017; 29(6):1277-1283. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-016-0695-2. View

3.
Boileau P, Alta T, Decroocq L, Sirveaux F, Clavert P, Favard L . Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute fractures in the elderly: is it worth reattaching the tuberosities?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 28(3):437-444. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.025. View

4.
Bonnevialle N, Tournier C, Clavert P, Ohl X, Sirveaux F, Saragaglia D . Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in 4-part displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: Multicenter retrospective study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016; 102(5):569-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.02.014. View

5.
Verdano M, Aliani D, Galavotti C, Maroun C, Vaienti E, Ceccarelli F . Grammont versus lateralizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: functional and radiographic outcomes. Musculoskelet Surg. 2018; 102(Suppl 1):57-65. DOI: 10.1007/s12306-018-0565-5. View