» Articles » PMID: 25631967

Evolving Trends in Surgically Managed Patients with Proximal Humerus Fracture: Are We Different After Ten Years?

Overview
Journal Singapore Med J
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 Jan 30
PMID 25631967
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: New knowledge, and improved surgical hardware and fixation techniques have changed surgical management. We review the evolving trends of surgically managed proximal humerus fractures.

Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for proximal humerus fractures from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2010 were identified from the hospital's electronic diagnosis and operative coding database. Data extracted from the database included patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical and radiological findings, operative techniques, and complications.

Results: In total, 95 patients with 97 surgically managed proximal humerus fractures were identified. The median age of the patients was 50 (range 12-85) years, and the male to female ratio was 1.2:1.0. Male patients tended to present at a younger age than female patients (peak age 30-39 years vs. 70-79 years, p < 0.001). Two-part surgical neck fracture was the most common type of fracture (n = 33, 34.0%). Plate osteosynthesis was predominantly used for two- and three-part surgical neck fractures involving the greater tuberosity (p = 0.03, p = 0.0002, respectively). Hemiarthroplasty was commonly performed for four-part fractures (p < 0.001). Wound infections, implant failure, avascular necrosis of the humeral head and nonunion were seen in 8 (8.3%) cases. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) had been in use since 2007 (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Surgically managed proximal humerus fractures predominantly involved young men following high velocity injury and elderly women following osteoporotic fractures. Open plating was most commonly used for two- and three-part fractures, and hemiarthroplasty for four-part fractures. MIPO techniques have been practised in our institution since 2007.

Citing Articles

Achieving satisfactory functional outcomes in conservatively treated proximal humerus fractures: relationship between shoulder range of motion and patient-reported clinical outcome scores.

Ong P, Lim C, Pereira M, Kwek E, Tan B JSES Int. 2024; 8(3):440-445.

PMID: 38707550 PMC: 11064704. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.02.003.


A Standardized Operative Protocol for Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures Using a Locking Plate to Minimize Surgery-Related Complications.

Kwisda S, Imiolczyk J, Imiolczyk T, Werth M, Scheibel M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36769863 PMC: 9917760. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12031216.

References
1.
Hintermann B, Trouillier H, Schafer D . Rigid internal fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus in older patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82(8):1107-12. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b8.10330. View

2.
Garrigues G, Johnston P, Pepe M, Tucker B, Ramsey M, Austin L . Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. Orthopedics. 2012; 35(5):e703-8. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120426-25. View

3.
Chu S, Kelsey J, Keegan T, Sternfeld B, Prill M, Quesenberry C . Risk factors for proximal humerus fracture. Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 160(4):360-7. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwh224. View

4.
Reitman R, Kerzhner E . Reverse shoulder arthoplasty as treatment for comminuted proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2011; 40(9):458-61. View

5.
Lau T, Leung F, Chan C, Chow S . Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture. Int Orthop. 2006; 31(5):657-64. PMC: 2266656. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0242-4. View