» Articles » PMID: 36760133

Population Pharmacokinetic Dosimetry Model Using Imaging Data to Assess Variability in Pharmacokinetics of Lu-PSMA-617 in Prostate Cancer Patients

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2023 Feb 10
PMID 36760133
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Studies to evaluate and optimize [ Lu]Lu-PSMA treatment focus primarily on individual patient data. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) dosimetry model was developed to explore the potential of using imaging data as input for population PK models and to characterize variability in organ and tumor uptake of [ Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with low volume metastatic prostate cancer. Simulations were performed to identify the effect of dose adjustments on absorbed doses in salivary glands and tumors. A six-compartment population PK model was developed, consisting of blood, salivary gland, kidneys, liver, tumor, and a lumped compartment representing other tissue (compartment 1-6, respectively), based on data from 10 patients who received [ Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (2 cycles, ~ 3 and ~ 6 GBq). Data consisted of radioactivity levels (decay corrected) in blood and tissues (9 blood samples and 5 single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography scans). Observations in all compartments were adequately captured by individual model predictions. Uptake into salivary glands was saturable with an estimated maximum binding capacity (B ) of 40.4 MBq (relative standard error 12.3%) with interindividual variability (IIV) of 59.3% (percent coefficient of variation [CV%]). IIV on other PK parameters was relatively minor. Tumor volume was included as a structural effect on the tumor uptake rate constant (k ), where a two-fold increase in tumor volume resulted in a 1.63-fold increase in k . In addition, interoccasion variability on k improved the model fit (43.5% [CV%]). Simulations showed a reduced absorbed dose per unit administered activity for salivary glands after increasing radioactivity dosing from 3 to 6 GBq (0.685 Gy/GBq vs. 0.421 Gy/GBq, respectively). All in all, population PK modeling could help to improve future radioligand therapy research.

Citing Articles

Biodosimetry, can it find its way to the nuclear medicine clinic?.

Bolcaen J, Combrink N, Spoormans K, More S, Vandevoorde C, Fisher R Front Nucl Med. 2024; 3:1209823.

PMID: 39355046 PMC: 11440959. DOI: 10.3389/fnume.2023.1209823.


A review of 177Lu dosimetry workflows: how to reduce the imaging workloads?.

Vergnaud L, Dewaraja Y, Giraudet A, Badel J, Sarrut D EJNMMI Phys. 2024; 11(1):65.

PMID: 39023648 PMC: 11554969. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-024-00658-8.


Quantification of biochemical PSA dynamics after radioligand therapy with [Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T using a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.

Siebinga H, de Wit-van der Veen B, de Vries-Huizing D, Vogel W, Hendrikx J, Huitema A EJNMMI Phys. 2024; 11(1):39.

PMID: 38656678 PMC: 11043318. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-024-00642-2.


The cycle effect quantified: reduced tumour uptake in subsequent cycles of [Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Siebinga H, Hendrikx J, de Vries-Huizing D, Huitema A, de Wit-van der Veen B Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023; 51(3):820-827.

PMID: 37843598 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06463-2.


Population pharmacokinetic dosimetry model using imaging data to assess variability in pharmacokinetics of Lu-PSMA-617 in prostate cancer patients.

Siebinga H, Prive B, Peters S, Nagarajah J, Dorlo T, Huitema A CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2023; 12(8):1060-1071.

PMID: 36760133 PMC: 10431047. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12914.

References
1.
Sjogreen Gleisner K, Chouin N, Minguez Gabina P, Cicone F, Gnesin S, Stokke C . EANM dosimetry committee recommendations for dosimetry of 177Lu-labelled somatostatin-receptor- and PSMA-targeting ligands. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022; 49(6):1778-1809. PMC: 9015994. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05727-7. View

2.
Eipel C, Abshagen K, Vollmar B . Regulation of hepatic blood flow: the hepatic arterial buffer response revisited. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16(48):6046-57. PMC: 3012579. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i48.6046. View

3.
Gaertner F, Halabi K, Ahmadzadehfar H, Kurpig S, Eppard E, Kotsikopoulos C . Uptake of PSMA-ligands in normal tissues is dependent on tumor load in patients with prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(33):55094-55103. PMC: 5589644. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19049. View

4.
Sartor O, de Bono J, Chi K, Fizazi K, Herrmann K, Rahbar K . Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385(12):1091-1103. PMC: 8446332. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107322. View

5.
Gafita A, Wang H, Robertson A, Armstrong W, Zaum R, Weber M . Tumor Sink Effect in Ga-PSMA-11 PET: Myth or Reality?. J Nucl Med. 2021; 63(2):226-232. PMC: 8805781. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.261906. View