» Articles » PMID: 33559792

Potential Synergy Between PSMA Uptake and Tumour Blood Flow for Prediction of Human Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness

Overview
Journal EJNMMI Res
Date 2021 Feb 9
PMID 33559792
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Both prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) uptake and tumour blood flow (TBF) correlate with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) and hence prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential synergistic benefit of combining the two physiologic parameters for separating significant PCa from insignificant findings.

Methods: From previous studies of [Rb]Rb positron emission tomography (PET) TBF in PCa, the 43 patients that underwent clinical [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET were selected for this retrospective study. Tumours were delineated on [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET or magnetic resonance imaging. ISUP GG was recorded from 52 lesions.

Results: [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and [Rb]Rb SUVmax correlated moderately with ISUP GG (rho = 0.59 and rho = 0.56, both p < 0.001) and with each other (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). A combined model of [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [Rb]Rb SUVmax separated ISUP GG > 2 from ISUP GG 1-2 and benign with an area-under-the-curve of 0.85, 96% sensitivity, 74% specificity, and 95% negative predictive value. The combined model performed significantly better than either tracer alone did (p < 0.001), primarily by reducing false negatives from five or six to one (p ≤ 0.025).

Conclusion: PSMA uptake and TBF provide complementary information about tumour aggressiveness. We suggest that a combined analysis of PSMA uptake and TBF could significantly improve the negative predictive value and allow non-invasive separation of significant from insignificant PCa.

Citing Articles

Influence of fasting prior to F-rhPSMA-7.3 (Flotufolastat F-18) PET/CT on biodistribution and tumor uptake.

Grigorascu S, Langbein T, Rauscher I, DAlessandria C, Maurer T, Hekimsoy T EJNMMI Res. 2024; 14(1):104.

PMID: 39531171 PMC: 11557739. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-024-01165-8.


Whole-body parametric mapping of tumour perfusion in metastatic prostate cancer using long axial field-of-view [O]HO PET.

Jochumsen M, Christensen N, Iversen P, Gormsen L, Sorensen J, Tolbod L Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(13):4134-4140.

PMID: 38940842 PMC: 11527927. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06799-3.


Can the Gleason score be predicted in patients with prostate cancer? A dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, Ga-PSMA PET/CT, PSA, and PSA-density comparison study.

Akkaya H, Dilek O, Ozdemir S, Tas Z, Ozturk I, Gulek B Diagn Interv Radiol. 2023; 29(5):647-655.

PMID: 37395389 PMC: 10679545. DOI: 10.4274/dir.2023.232186.


Population pharmacokinetic dosimetry model using imaging data to assess variability in pharmacokinetics of Lu-PSMA-617 in prostate cancer patients.

Siebinga H, Prive B, Peters S, Nagarajah J, Dorlo T, Huitema A CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2023; 12(8):1060-1071.

PMID: 36760133 PMC: 10431047. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12914.


Evaluation of Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients, as Detected by Ga-PSMA PET/CT.

Christensen M, Jochumsen M, Klingenberg S, Sorensen K, Borre M, Bouchelouche K Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(1).

PMID: 35054362 PMC: 8774699. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010195.

References
1.
Stabile A, Giganti F, Kasivisvanathan V, Giannarini G, Moore C, Padhani A . Factors Influencing Variability in the Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020; 3(2):145-167. PMC: 8942295. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.02.005. View

2.
Jochumsen M, Sorensen J, Pedersen B, Nyengaard J, Krag S, Frokiaer J . Tumour blood flow for prediction of human prostate cancer aggressiveness: a study with Rubidium-82 PET, MRI and Na/K-ATPase-density. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020; 48(2):532-542. PMC: 7835182. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04998-2. View

3.
Hotker A, Mazaheri Y, Aras O, Zheng J, Moskowitz C, Gondo T . Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness by Use of the Combination of Quantitative DWI and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016; 206(4):756-63. PMC: 5479568. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.14912. View

4.
Mirpour S, Khandani A . Extracardiac abnormalities on rubidium-82 cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Nucl Med Commun. 2011; 32(4):260-4. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283440dcb. View

5.
Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz A, Haider M, Padhani A, Villeirs G, Macura K . Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol. 2019; 76(3):340-351. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. View