» Articles » PMID: 36355977

Analytical Validation of a Direct Competitive ELISA for Multiple Mycotoxin Detection in Human Serum

Overview
Journal Toxins (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Toxicology
Date 2022 Nov 10
PMID 36355977
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mycotoxin exposure in humans is primarily assessed through its occurrence in external sources, such as food commodities. Herein, we have developed a direct competitive ELISA to facilitate the detection of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), deoxynivalenol (DON), fumonisin (FUM B1/B2), ochratoxin A (OTA), and zearalenone (ZEA) in human serum. The analytical validation of the assay followed practices endorsed by the international research community and the EU directive 96/23/EC in order to examine detection capability, recovery, and cross-reactivity. The assay demonstrated a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for AFB1 [0.61 ng/mL (hereon ng/mL = ppb)], DON (19.53 ppb), FUM (4.88 ppb), OTA (19.53 ppb), and ZEA (0.15 ppb). Recovery from human serum for all mycotoxins spanned from 73% to 106%. Likewise, the specificity for monoclonal antibodies against cross-reactant mycotoxins ranged from 2% to 11%. This study compares the LLOQ and recovery values with commercial and emerging immuno-based methods for detecting mycotoxins in foodstuffs. The LLOQ values from the present study were among the lowest in commercial or emerging methods. Despite the differences in the extraction protocols and matrices, the recovery range in this study, commercial tests, and other procedures were similar for all mycotoxins. Overall, the assay detected AFB1, DON, FUM, OTA, and ZEA in human serum with excellent accuracy, precision, and specificity.

Citing Articles

Advances in Aptamer-Based Conjugate Recognition Techniques for the Detection of Small Molecules in Food.

Deng X, Ma B, Gong Y, Li J, Zhou Y, Xu T Foods. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38890976 PMC: 11172347. DOI: 10.3390/foods13111749.


Evaluation of distribution of emerging mycotoxins in human tissues: applications of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Castell A, Arroyo-Manzanares N, Palma-Manrique R, Campillo N, Torres C, Fenoll J Anal Bioanal Chem. 2023; 416(2):449-459.

PMID: 37987769 PMC: 10761373. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-023-05040-8.


Recent Advances in Electrochemiluminescence Biosensors for Mycotoxin Assay.

Jin L, Liu W, Xiao Z, Yang H, Yu H, Dong C Biosensors (Basel). 2023; 13(6).

PMID: 37367018 PMC: 10296450. DOI: 10.3390/bios13060653.

References
1.
Alshannaq A, Yu J . Occurrence, Toxicity, and Analysis of Major Mycotoxins in Food. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(6). PMC: 5486318. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14060632. View

2.
Zhang W, Tang S, Jin Y, Yang C, He L, Wang J . Multiplex SERS-based lateral flow immunosensor for the detection of major mycotoxins in maize utilizing dual Raman labels and triple test lines. J Hazard Mater. 2020; 393:122348. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122348. View

3.
Lee K, Dipaolo B, Ji X . Calibration and LOD/LOQ estimation of a chemiluminescent hybridization assay for residual DNA in recombinant protein drugs expressed in E. coli using a four-parameter logistic model. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2000; 26(6):661-9. DOI: 10.1081/ddc-100101281. View

4.
Escriva L, Font G, Manyes L, Berrada H . Studies on the Presence of Mycotoxins in Biological Samples: An Overview. Toxins (Basel). 2017; 9(8). PMC: 5577585. DOI: 10.3390/toxins9080251. View

5.
Eskola M, Kos G, Elliott C, Hajslova J, Mayar S, Krska R . Worldwide contamination of food-crops with mycotoxins: Validity of the widely cited 'FAO estimate' of 25. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019; 60(16):2773-2789. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1658570. View