» Articles » PMID: 36308047

Swelling-Dependent Shape-Based Transformation of a Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-Laden 4D Bioprinted Construct for Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Abstract

3D bioprinting is usually implemented on flat surfaces, posing serious limitations in the fabrication of multilayered curved constructs. 4D bioprinting, combining 3D bioprinting with time-dependent stimuli-induced transformation, enables the fabrication of shape-changing constructs. Here, a 4D biofabrication method is reported for cartilage engineering based on the differential swelling of a smart multi-material system made from two hydrogel-based materials: hyaluronan and alginate. Two ink formulations are used: tyramine-functionalized hyaluronan (HAT, high-swelling) and alginate with HAT (AHAT, low-swelling). Both inks have similar elastic, shear-thinning, and printability behavior. The inks are 3D printed into a bilayered scaffold before triggering the shape-change by using liquid immersion as stimulus. In time (4D), the differential swelling between the two zones leads to the scaffold's self-bending. Different designs are made to tune the radius of curvature and shape. A bioprinted formulation of AHAT and human bone marrow cells demonstrates high cell viability. After 28 days in chondrogenic medium, the curvature is clearly present while cartilage-like matrix production is visible on histology. A proof-of-concept of the recently emerged technology of 4D bioprinting with a specific application for the design of curved structures potentially mimicking the curvature and multilayer cellular nature of native cartilage is demonstrated.

Citing Articles

Reprogrammable 4D Tissue Engineering Hydrogel Scaffold via Reversible Ion Printing.

Ding A, Tang F, Alsberg E bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39990422 PMC: 11844475. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.11.637741.


Programmed shape transformations in cell-laden granular composites.

Di Caprio N, Hughes A, Burdick J Sci Adv. 2025; 11(3):eadq5011.

PMID: 39823334 PMC: 11740954. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adq5011.


Functional Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review of Materials, Methods, and Future Directions.

Todd E, Mirsky N, Silva B, Shinde A, Arakelians A, Nayak V J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(10).

PMID: 39452579 PMC: 11509029. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15100280.


Integrative Modeling and Experimental Insights into 3D and 4D Printing Technologies.

Pereira A, Nayak V, Coelho P, Witek L Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(19).

PMID: 39408397 PMC: 11479055. DOI: 10.3390/polym16192686.


Smart Multi-Responsive Biomaterials and Their Applications for 4D Bioprinting.

Kim J, D A G, Debnath P, Saha P Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(8).

PMID: 39194463 PMC: 11351532. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9080484.


References
1.
Collins M, Birkinshaw C . Hyaluronic acid based scaffolds for tissue engineering--a review. Carbohydr Polym. 2013; 92(2):1262-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.028. View

2.
Li M, Tian X, Chen X . Temperature effect on the shear-induced cell damage in biofabrication. Artif Organs. 2011; 35(7):741-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.01193.x. View

3.
Gao B, Yang Q, Zhao X, Jin G, Ma Y, Xu F . 4D Bioprinting for Biomedical Applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2016; 34(9):746-756. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.004. View

4.
Skardal A, Zhang J, Prestwich G . Bioprinting vessel-like constructs using hyaluronan hydrogels crosslinked with tetrahedral polyethylene glycol tetracrylates. Biomaterials. 2010; 31(24):6173-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.045. View

5.
Li Y, Zhang Y, Akpek A, Shin S, Khademhosseini A . 4D bioprinting: the next-generation technology for biofabrication enabled by stimuli-responsive materials. Biofabrication. 2016; 9(1):012001. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/9/1/012001. View