4D Bioprinting of Programmed Dynamic Tissues

Overview

Journal Bioact Mater

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2024 May 2

PMID 38694766

Authors

Jiahui Lai

Yuwei Liu

Gang Lu

Patrick Yung

Xiaoying Wang

Rocky S Tuan

Zhong Alan Li

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Setting time as the fourth dimension, 4D printing allows us to construct dynamic structures that can change their shape, property, or functionality over time under stimuli, leading to a wave of innovations in various fields. Recently, 4D printing of smart biomaterials, biological components, and living cells into dynamic living 3D constructs with 4D effects has led to an exciting field of 4D bioprinting. 4D bioprinting has gained increasing attention and is being applied to create programmed and dynamic cell-laden constructs such as bone, cartilage, and vasculature. This review presents an overview on 4D bioprinting for engineering dynamic tissues and organs, followed by a discussion on the approaches, bioprinting technologies, smart biomaterials and smart design, bioink requirements, and applications. While much progress has been achieved, 4D bioprinting as a complex process is facing challenges that need to be addressed by transdisciplinary strategies to unleash the full potential of this advanced biofabrication technology. Finally, we present future perspectives on the rapidly evolving field of 4D bioprinting, in view of its potential, increasingly important roles in the development of advanced dynamic tissues for basic research, pharmaceutics, and regenerative medicine.

Citing Articles

Bioengineering strategies targeting angiogenesis: Innovative solutions for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Zhu W, Xu Z, Zhou D, Xu J, He Y, Li Z J Tissue Eng. 2025; 16:20417314241310541.

PMID: 39866964 PMC: 11760140. DOI: 10.1177/20417314241310541.

Narrative Review and Guide: State of the Art and Emerging Opportunities of Bioprinting in Tissue Regeneration and Medical Instrumentation.

Halper J Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39851345 PMC: 11760465. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12010071.

4D printing: innovative solutions and technological advances in orthopedic repair and reconstruction, personalized treatment and drug delivery.

Shen C, Shen A Biomed Eng Online. 2025; 24(1):5.

PMID: 39838448 PMC: 11748259. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-025-01334-3.

AI-driven 3D bioprinting for regenerative medicine: From bench to bedside.

Zhang Z, Zhou X, Fang Y, Xiong Z, Zhang T Bioact Mater. 2024; 45:201-230.

PMID: 39651398 PMC: 11625302. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.11.021.

Biocomposite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: Materials, Fabrication Techniques and Future Directions.

Sultana N, Cole A, Strachan F Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(22).

PMID: 39597399 PMC: 11595283. DOI: 10.3390/ma17225577.

References

Li X, Xu K, He Y, Tao B, Li K, Lin C . ROS-responsive hydrogel coating modified titanium promotes vascularization and osteointegration of bone defects by orchestrating immunomodulation. Biomaterials. 2022; 287:121683. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121683. View

Kuribayashi-Shigetomi K, Onoe H, Takeuchi S . Cell origami: self-folding of three-dimensional cell-laden microstructures driven by cell traction force. PLoS One. 2012; 7(12):e51085. PMC: 3521028. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051085. View

Jorgensen A, Yoo J, Atala A . Solid Organ Bioprinting: Strategies to Achieve Organ Function. Chem Rev. 2020; 120(19):11093-11127. PMC: 8459198. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00145. View

Zhao W, Yue C, Liu L, Liu Y, Leng J . Research Progress of Shape Memory Polymer and 4D Printing in Biomedical Application. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022; 12(16):e2201975. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202201975. View

Du V, Luciani N, Richard S, Mary G, Gay C, Mazuel F . A 3D magnetic tissue stretcher for remote mechanical control of embryonic stem cell differentiation. Nat Commun. 2017; 8(1):400. PMC: 5596024. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00543-2. View

Paxton N, Smolan W, Bock T, Melchels F, Groll J, Jungst T . Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability. Biofabrication. 2017; 9(4):044107. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8. View

Yang G, Rothrauff B, Lin H, Yu S, Tuan R . Tendon-Derived Extracellular Matrix Enhances Transforming Growth Factor-β3-Induced Tenogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2016; 23(3-4):166-176. PMC: 5312607. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2015.0498. View

Trujillo-Miranda M, Apsite I, Agudo J, Constante G, Ionov L . 4D Biofabrication of Mechanically Stable Tubular Constructs Using Shape Morphing Porous Bilayers for Vascularization Application. Macromol Biosci. 2022; 23(1):e2200320. DOI: 10.1002/mabi.202200320. View

Janani G, Priya S, Dey S, Mandal B . Mimicking Native Liver Lobule Microarchitecture In Vitro with Parenchymal and Non-parenchymal Cells Using 3D Bioprinting for Drug Toxicity and Drug Screening Applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022; 14(8):10167-10186. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c00312. View

10.

Li X, Liu B, Pei B, Chen J, Zhou D, Peng J . Inkjet Bioprinting of Biomaterials. Chem Rev. 2020; 120(19):10793-10833. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008. View

11.

Wang C, Yue H, Liu J, Zhao Q, He Z, Li K . Advanced reconfigurable scaffolds fabricated by 4D printing for treating critical-size bone defects of irregular shapes. Biofabrication. 2020; 12(4):045025. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/abab5b. View

12.

Goulart E, de Caires-Junior L, Telles-Silva K, Araujo B, Rocco S, Sforca M . 3D bioprinting of liver spheroids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells sustain liver function and viability in vitro. Biofabrication. 2019; 12(1):015010. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab4a30. View

13.

Kung F . Injectable collagen/RGD systems for bone tissue engineering applications. Biomed Mater Eng. 2018; 29(2):241-251. DOI: 10.3233/BME-171726. View

14.

Zhang C, Cai D, Liao P, Su J, Deng H, Vardhanabhuti B . 4D Printing of shape-memory polymeric scaffolds for adaptive biomedical implantation. Acta Biomater. 2020; 122:101-110. PMC: 7897283. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.042. View

15.

Chen H, Ma X, Gao T, Zhao W, Xu T, Liu Z . Robot-assisted in situ bioprinting of gelatin methacrylate hydrogels with stem cells induces hair follicle-inclusive skin regeneration. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022; 158:114140. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.114140. View

16.

Gong C, Kong Z, Wang X . The Effect of Agarose on 3D Bioprinting. Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13(22). PMC: 8620953. DOI: 10.3390/polym13224028. View

17.

Mota C, Camarero-Espinosa S, Baker M, Wieringa P, Moroni L . Bioprinting: From Tissue and Organ Development to Models. Chem Rev. 2020; 120(19):10547-10607. PMC: 7564098. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00789. View

18.

Chen S, Tan S, Zheng L, Wang M . Multilayered Shape-Morphing Scaffolds with a Hierarchical Structure for Uterine Tissue Regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024; 16(6):6772-6788. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c14983. View

19.

Chen M, Gao M, Bai L, Zheng H, Qi H, Zhou K . Recent Advances in 4D Printing of Liquid Crystal Elastomers. Adv Mater. 2022; 35(23):e2209566. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202209566. View

20.

Wolf K, Weiss J, Uzel S, Skylar-Scott M, Lewis J . Biomanufacturing human tissues via organ building blocks. Cell Stem Cell. 2022; 29(5):667-677. PMC: 9617289. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2022.04.012. View