» Articles » PMID: 36307400

Overlapping Gene Dependencies for PARP Inhibitors and Carboplatin Response Identified by Functional CRISPR-Cas9 Screening in Ovarian Cancer

Overview
Journal Cell Death Dis
Date 2022 Oct 28
PMID 36307400
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) treatment with outstanding benefits in regard to progression-free survival, especially in patients either carrying BRCA1/2 mutations or harboring defects in the homologous recombination repair system. Yet, it remains uncertain which PARPi to apply and how to predict responders when platinum sensitivity is unknown. To shed light on the predictive power of genes previously suggested to be associated with PARPi response, we systematically reviewed the literature and identified 79 publications investigating a total of 93 genes. The top candidate genes were further tested using a comprehensive CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis screening in combination with olaparib treatment. Therefore, we generated six constitutive Cas9 EOC cell lines and profiled 33 genes in a CRISPR-Cas9 cell competition assay using non-essential (AAVS1) and essential (RPA3 and PCNA) genes for cell fitness as negative and positive controls, respectively. We identified only ATM, MUS81, NBN, BRCA2, and RAD51B as predictive markers for olaparib response. As the major survival benefit of PARPi treatment was reported in platinum-sensitive tumors, we next assessed nine top candidate genes in combination with three PARPi and carboplatin. Interestingly, we observed similar dropout rates in a gene and compound independent manner, supporting the strong correlation of cancer cell response to compounds that rely on DNA repair for their effectiveness. In addition, we report on CDK12 as a common vulnerability for EOC cell survival and proliferation without altering the olaparib response, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic target in EOC.

Citing Articles

Predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: an updated systematic review.

Wang Y, Allen I, Funingana G, Tischkowitz M, Joko-Fru Y BJC Rep. 2025; 3(1):14.

PMID: 40069561 PMC: 11897386. DOI: 10.1038/s44276-025-00122-9.


Repression of PFKFB3 sensitizes ovarian cancer to PARP inhibitors by impairing homologous recombination repair.

Xiao Y, Wu Y, Wang Q, Li M, Deng C, Gu X Cell Commun Signal. 2025; 23(1):48.

PMID: 39863903 PMC: 11762855. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-025-02056-8.


Cyclin-dependent protein kinases and cell cycle regulation in biology and disease.

Pellarin I, DallAcqua A, Favero A, Segatto I, Rossi V, Crestan N Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025; 10(1):11.

PMID: 39800748 PMC: 11734941. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-02080-z.


BRCA loss of function including BRCA1 DNA-methylation, but not BRCA-unrelated homologous recombination deficiency, is associated with platinum hypersensitivity in high-grade ovarian cancer.

Fiegl H, Schnaiter S, Reimer D, Leitner K, Nardelli P, Tsibulak I Clin Epigenetics. 2024; 16(1):171.

PMID: 39605059 PMC: 11603837. DOI: 10.1186/s13148-024-01781-0.


SART1 modulates poly-(ADP-ribose) chain accumulation and PARP1 chromatin localization.

Lodovichi S, Nepomuceno T, Woods N, Rix U, Koomen J, Pellicioli A iScience. 2024; 27(11):111252.

PMID: 39569366 PMC: 11576398. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111252.


References
1.
Brinkman E, Chen T, Amendola M, van Steensel B . Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42(22):e168. PMC: 4267669. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku936. View

2.
Bang Y, Im S, Lee K, Cho J, Song E, Lee K . Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II Trial With Prospective Classification by ATM Protein Level to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Olaparib Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Gastric Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(33):3858-65. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.0320. View

3.
Hoppe M, Jaynes P, Wardyn J, Upadhyayula S, Tan T, Lie S . Quantitative imaging of RAD51 expression as a marker of platinum resistance in ovarian cancer. EMBO Mol Med. 2021; 13(5):e13366. PMC: 8103098. DOI: 10.15252/emmm.202013366. View

4.
Domcke S, Sinha R, Levine D, Sander C, Schultz N . Evaluating cell lines as tumour models by comparison of genomic profiles. Nat Commun. 2013; 4:2126. PMC: 3715866. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3126. View

5.
Natrajan R, Wilkerson P, Marchio C, Piscuoglio S, Ng C, Wai P . Characterization of the genomic features and expressed fusion genes in micropapillary carcinomas of the breast. J Pathol. 2014; 232(5):553-65. PMC: 4013428. DOI: 10.1002/path.4325. View