Nucleus Size and Its Effect on Nucleosome Stability in Living Cells

Overview

Journal Biophys J

Publisher Cell Press

Specialty Biophysics

Date 2022 Sep 23

PMID 36146936

Authors

Artem K Efremov

Ladislav Hovan

Jie Yan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

DNA architectural proteins play a major role in organization of chromosomal DNA in living cells by packaging it into chromatin, whose spatial conformation is determined by an intricate interplay between the DNA-binding properties of architectural proteins and physical constraints applied to the DNA by a tight nuclear space. Yet, the exact effects of the nucleus size on DNA-protein interactions and chromatin structure currently remain obscure. Furthermore, there is even no clear understanding of molecular mechanisms responsible for the nucleus size regulation in living cells. To find answers to these questions, we developed a general theoretical framework based on a combination of polymer field theory and transfer-matrix calculations, which showed that the nucleus size is mainly determined by the difference between the surface tensions of the nuclear envelope and the endoplasmic reticulum membrane as well as the osmotic pressure exerted by cytosolic macromolecules on the nucleus. In addition, the model demonstrated that the cell nucleus functions as a piezoelectric element, changing its electrostatic potential in a size-dependent manner. This effect has been found to have a profound impact on stability of nucleosomes, revealing a previously unknown link between the nucleus size and chromatin structure. Overall, our study provides new insights into the molecular mechanisms responsible for regulation of the nucleus size, as well as the potential role of nuclear organization in shaping the cell response to environmental cues.

Citing Articles

Regulation of chromatin modifications through coordination of nucleus size and epithelial cell morphology heterogeneity.

Bermudez A, Latham Z, Ma A, Bi D, Hu J, Lin N Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):269.

PMID: 39979587 PMC: 11842846. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07677-w.

Divergent Contribution of Cytoplasmic Actins to Nuclear Structure of Lung Cancer Cells.

Shagieva G, Dugina V, Burakov A, Levuschkina Y, Kudlay D, Boichuk S Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 25(24.

PMID: 39769373 PMC: 11727787. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252413607.

Confinement-sensitive volume regulation dynamics via high-speed nuclear morphological measurements.

Li Y, Ong H, Cui H, Gao X, Lee J, Guo Y Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(52):e2408595121.

PMID: 39700138 PMC: 11670245. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2408595121.

Claudin-4 remodeling of nucleus-cell cycle crosstalk maintains ovarian tumor genome stability and drives resistance to genomic instability-inducing agents.

Villagomez F, Lang J, Nunez-Avellaneda D, Behbakht K, Dimmick H, Webb P bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39282307 PMC: 11398366. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.04.611120.

Temperature-dependent ejection evolution arising from active and passive effects in DNA viruses.

Zhang C, Zhang N Biophys J. 2024; 123(19):3317-3330.

PMID: 39091028 PMC: 11480759. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.07.037.

References

Chiariello A, Annunziatella C, Bianco S, Esposito A, Nicodemi M . Polymer physics of chromosome large-scale 3D organisation. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:29775. PMC: 4942835. DOI: 10.1038/srep29775. View

Fazelkhah A, Braasch K, Afshar S, Salimi E, Butler M, Bridges G . Quantitative Model for Ion Transport and Cytoplasm Conductivity of Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):17818. PMC: 6292909. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36127-3. View

Bustamante C, Marko J, Siggia E, Smith S . Entropic elasticity of lambda-phage DNA. Science. 1994; 265(5178):1599-600. DOI: 10.1126/science.8079175. View

Allahverdi A, Chen Q, Korolev N, Nordenskiold L . Chromatin compaction under mixed salt conditions: opposite effects of sodium and potassium ions on nucleosome array folding. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:8512. PMC: 4330525. DOI: 10.1038/srep08512. View

Hammond C, Stromme C, Huang H, Patel D, Groth A . Histone chaperone networks shaping chromatin function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017; 18(3):141-158. PMC: 5319910. DOI: 10.1038/nrm.2016.159. View

Benedetti F, Dorier J, Burnier Y, Stasiak A . Models that include supercoiling of topological domains reproduce several known features of interphase chromosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 42(5):2848-55. PMC: 3950722. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1353. View

Grayson P, Evilevitch A, Inamdar M, Purohit P, Gelbart W, Knobler C . The effect of genome length on ejection forces in bacteriophage lambda. Virology. 2006; 348(2):430-6. PMC: 3178461. DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.01.003. View

Mirny L . The fractal globule as a model of chromatin architecture in the cell. Chromosome Res. 2011; 19(1):37-51. PMC: 3040307. DOI: 10.1007/s10577-010-9177-0. View

Meng H, Andresen K, van Noort J . Quantitative analysis of single-molecule force spectroscopy on folded chromatin fibers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(7):3578-90. PMC: 4402534. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv215. View

10.

Liu T, Sae-Ueng U, Li D, Lander G, Zuo X, Jonsson B . Solid-to-fluid-like DNA transition in viruses facilitates infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(41):14675-80. PMC: 4205597. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1321637111. View

11.

Anderson D, Hetzer M . Reshaping of the endoplasmic reticulum limits the rate for nuclear envelope formation. J Cell Biol. 2008; 182(5):911-24. PMC: 2528577. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200805140. View

12.

Evans E, Waugh R, Melnik L . Elastic area compressibility modulus of red cell membrane. Biophys J. 1976; 16(6):585-95. PMC: 1334882. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85713-X. View

13.

Rosa A, Everaers R . Structure and dynamics of interphase chromosomes. PLoS Comput Biol. 2008; 4(8):e1000153. PMC: 2515109. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000153. View

14.

Dahl K, Kahn S, Wilson K, Discher D . The nuclear envelope lamina network has elasticity and a compressibility limit suggestive of a molecular shock absorber. J Cell Sci. 2004; 117(Pt 20):4779-86. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.01357. View

15.

Mosammaparast N, Ewart C, Pemberton L . A role for nucleosome assembly protein 1 in the nuclear transport of histones H2A and H2B. EMBO J. 2002; 21(23):6527-38. PMC: 136951. DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdf647. View

16.

Finan J, Chalut K, Wax A, Guilak F . Nonlinear osmotic properties of the cell nucleus. Ann Biomed Eng. 2008; 37(3):477-91. PMC: 2749482. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-008-9618-5. View

17.

Keck K, Pemberton L . Histone chaperones link histone nuclear import and chromatin assembly. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011; 1819(3-4):277-89. PMC: 3272145. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.09.007. View

18.

Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum N, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A . Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science. 2009; 326(5950):289-93. PMC: 2858594. DOI: 10.1126/science.1181369. View

19.

Schmidt E, Schibler U . Cell size regulation, a mechanism that controls cellular RNA accumulation: consequences on regulation of the ubiquitous transcription factors Oct1 and NF-Y and the liver-enriched transcription factor DBP. J Cell Biol. 1995; 128(4):467-83. PMC: 2199888. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.128.4.467. View

20.

Weidemann T, Wachsmuth M, Knoch T, Muller G, Waldeck W, Langowski J . Counting nucleosomes in living cells with a combination of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and confocal imaging. J Mol Biol. 2003; 334(2):229-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.08.063. View