» Articles » PMID: 36140629

An Interesting Image of Transmural Migration of a Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device (LNg-IUD)

Abstract

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are very common as a method of birth control. By adding progesterone (levonorgestrel), a decrease in the risk of complications has been documented, including the risk of perforation. Even though only a few complications have been described, adjacent organs may be involved in the case of migration-a life-threatening situation. A 45-year-old G4P2 woman was seen in our clinic for LNg-IUD removal, according to the medical instructions. Her main complaints were abdominal discomfort, low back pain, and recurrent menorrhagia. A "lost" IUD was initially suspected; the patient confirmed the detection and removal of the control strings, and a subsequent discussion related to delayed transmural migration of the IUD being followed. The ultrasonography revealed the migration of the IUD to the uterine cervix and size-decreased uterine fibroids, confirming the effectiveness of the LNg-IUD. The MRI and ultrasonography being useless, a subsequent X-ray and CT scan were requested, both confirming a myometrium-positioned IUD, adjacent to the serosa and lumbosacral plexus. Even though the IUD is considered a safe device with reversible effect, it can be associated with severe morbidity, with an ultrasound follow-up being required. For more precise detection of the IUD, we strongly recommend an X-ray or CT scan examination, followed by safe removal.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of Oral Medications or Intrauterine Device-Delivered Progestin in Patients with Endometrial Hyperplasia with or without Atypia: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Zhang Y, Fan Y, Mu Y, Li J J Clin Med. 2023; 12(8).

PMID: 37109316 PMC: 10143726. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082980.

References
1.
Akpinar F, Ozgur E, Yilmaz S, Ustaoglu O . Sigmoid colon migration of an intrauterine device. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 2014:207659. PMC: 4129669. DOI: 10.1155/2014/207659. View

2.
Weerasekera A, Wijesinghe P, Nugaduwa N . Sigmoid colocolic fistula caused by intrauterine device migration: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014; 8:81. PMC: 3946035. DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-8-81. View

3.
Mederos R, Humaran L, Minervini D . Surgical removal of an intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon: a case report. Int J Surg. 2007; 6(6):e60-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.02.006. View

4.
Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell D . Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives. Open Access J Contracept. 2018; 7:19-32. PMC: 5683155. DOI: 10.2147/OAJC.S85546. View

5.
Golightly E, Gebbie A . Low-lying or malpositioned intrauterine devices and systems. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014; 40(2):108-12. DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100684. View