» Articles » PMID: 25136463

Sigmoid Colon Migration of an Intrauterine Device

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2014 Aug 20
PMID 25136463
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background. Intrauterine devices (IUD) are commonly used birth control methods. Colonic perforation is an infrequent but serious complication of IUD. Case. A 34-year-old woman with 2-years history of IUD, inserted at early puerperal period, presented to gynecologist with chronic pelvic pain and dyspareunia. Radiological assessment revealed that there were two copper-T devices: one in uterine cavity and another in the colonic lumen. Attempts of retrieval with colonoscopy and laparoscopy were unsuccessful. Intrauterine device embedded in sigmoid colon wall was removed with resection of the involved segment and primary anastomosis was performed. Conclusion. Although there are cases in literature that are successfully managed with colonoscopy, in chronic cases, formation of granulation tissue complicates retrieval of an IUD by this intervention.

Citing Articles

Asymptomatic uterine perforation and IUD migration to the broad ligament: A case report.

Jia G, Liu X, He Y, Du P, Sun Z, Chai W Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(7):e33857.

PMID: 38363896 PMC: 10869031. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033857.


An Interesting Image of Transmural Migration of a Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device (LNg-IUD).

Mitranovici M, Chiorean D, Sabau A, Cocuz I, Tinca A, Marginean M Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 36140629 PMC: 9498182. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092227.


Is It a "Colon Perforation"? A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Lu S, Yao X, Shi J, Huang J, Zhuang S, Ma J Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:817029.

PMID: 35360735 PMC: 8960373. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.817029.


Complications associated with intravesical migration of an intrauterine device.

Rasekhjahromi A, Chitsazi Z, Khlili A, Babaarabi Z Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020; 63(5):675-678.

PMID: 32668521 PMC: 7494766. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.19105.


Retained copper fragments following removal of a copper intrauterine device: Two case reports.

Dubovis M, Rizk N Case Rep Womens Health. 2020; 27:e00208.

PMID: 32337163 PMC: 7180360. DOI: 10.1016/j.crwh.2020.e00208.


References
1.
. Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Report of a WHO Scientific Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1987; 753:1-91. View

2.
Weerasekera A, Wijesinghe P, Nugaduwa N . Sigmoid colocolic fistula caused by intrauterine device migration: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014; 8:81. PMC: 3946035. DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-8-81. View

3.
Shin D, Kim T, Lee W . Intrauterine device embedded into the bladder wall with stone formation: laparoscopic removal is a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011; 23(8):1129-31. PMC: 3396349. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1632-8. View

4.
Huertas-Velasco M, Gomez-Rubio M . [Endoscopic removal of intrauterine device penetrated through the rectal wall]. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2012; 104(8):432-3. DOI: 10.4321/s1130-01082012000800007. View

5.
Mosley F, Shahi N, Kurer M . Elective surgical removal of migrated intrauterine contraceptive devices from within the peritoneal cavity: a comparison between open and laparoscopic removal. JSLS. 2013; 16(2):236-41. PMC: 3481248. DOI: 10.4293/108680812x13427982377265. View