» Articles » PMID: 32563091

Intrauterine Device Migration into the Lumen of Large Bowel: A Case Report

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2020 Jun 21
PMID 32563091
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Colon perforation caused by the intrauterine device (IUD) migration is rare, but severe complication that can occur years after the insertion. Depending on the location of the injured intestine, the different methods for extracting migrated IUD raging from colonoscopy to laparotomy can be chosen.

Case Presentation: A 41-year-old female presented with the discomfort in the epigastric area went to the outpatient clinic. A doctor performed gastroscopy and found a polyp. During a colonoscopy, we found a small solid object protruding through the intestinal wall. CT scan showed IUD like "T" shape foreign body, which longest part was protruding a wall of the colon. After these CT findings, the patient informed us that she had IUD inserted almost ten years ago. We found the device with the laparoscopic approach. IUD was removed and the intestinal damage was repaired during the mini-laparotomy.

Conclusions: Perforation of IUD can be asymptomatic, although sometimes it can cause short-term or long-term symptoms. Penetrated IUDs should be removed whenever identified. For intra-abdominal penetrations, the laparoscopic or mini-laparotomy approach is a safe and appropriate method.

Citing Articles

Migrated intra-uterine device to infra-umbilical skin: a rare case report.

Addis N, Sibhat Y, Molla Y, Mengestu W, Seid A, Damite M BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):672.

PMID: 39736668 PMC: 11684260. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03522-0.


Case report: An intrauterine device hugging the musculus rectus abdominis through the center of a cesarean scar.

Jing J Front Surg. 2023; 9:956856.

PMID: 36684317 PMC: 9852525. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.956856.


An Interesting Image of Transmural Migration of a Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device (LNg-IUD).

Mitranovici M, Chiorean D, Sabau A, Cocuz I, Tinca A, Marginean M Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 36140629 PMC: 9498182. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092227.


Rare case of rectal perforation by an intrauterine device: Case report and review of the literature.

Boushehry R, Al-Taweel T, Bandar A, Hasan M, Atnuos M, Alkhamis A Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022; 99:107610.

PMID: 36116303 PMC: 9568710. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107610.


Is It a "Colon Perforation"? A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Lu S, Yao X, Shi J, Huang J, Zhuang S, Ma J Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:817029.

PMID: 35360735 PMC: 8960373. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.817029.

References
1.
Gonenc M, Kalayci M, Turhan A, Deniztas C, Alis H . Endoscopic treatment of a transmigrated intrauterine device to colonic wall: a case report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204(3):e3-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.037. View

2.
Black A, Guilbert E, Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S . Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 3 of 4): Chapter 7--Intrauterine Contraception. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016; 38(2):182-222. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2015.12.002. View

3.
ZAKIN D, STERN W, Rosenblatt R . Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. II. Diagnostic methods, prevention, and management. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981; 36(8):401-17. DOI: 10.1097/00006254-198108000-00001. View

4.
Sentilhes L, Lefebvre-Lacoeuille C, Poilblanc M, Descamps P . Incidental finding of an intrauterine device in the sigmoid colon. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008; 13(2):212-4. DOI: 10.1080/13625180801892868. View

5.
Rao R . Lost intrauterine devices and their localization. J Reprod Med. 1978; 20(4):195-9. View