Monte Carlo Modeling of the Elekta Versa HD and Patient Dose Calculation with EGSnrc/BEAMnrc

Overview

Journal J Appl Clin Med Phys

Specialties Biophysics
General Medicine

Date 2022 Aug 19

PMID 35985698

Authors

Holly M Parenica Paschal

Christopher N Kabat

Pavlos Papaconstadopoulos

Neil A Kirby

Pamela A Myers

Timothy D Wagner

Sotirios Stathakis

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Numerous studies have proven the Monte Carlo method to be an accurate means of dose calculation. Although there are several commercial Monte Carlo treatment planning systems (TPSs), some clinics may not have access to these resources. We present a method for routine, independent patient dose calculations from treatment plans generated in a commercial TPS with our own Monte Carlo model using free, open-source software.

Materials And Methods: A model of the Elekta Versa HD linear accelerator was developed using the EGSnrc codes. A MATLAB script was created to take clinical patient plans and convert the DICOM RTP files into a format usable by EGSnrc. Ten patients' treatment plans were exported from the Monaco TPS to be recalculated using EGSnrc. Treatment simulations were done in BEAMnrc, and doses were calculated using Source 21 in DOSXYZnrc. Results were compared to patient plans calculated in the Monaco TPS and evaluated in Verisoft with a gamma criterion of 3%/2 mm.

Results: Our Monte Carlo model was validated within 1%/1-mm accuracy of measured percent depth doses and profiles. Gamma passing rates ranged from 82.1% to 99.8%, with 7 out of 10 plans having a gamma pass rate over 95%. Lung and prostate patients showed the best agreement with doses calculated in Monaco. All statistical uncertainties in DOSXYZnrc were less than 3.0%.

Conclusion: A Monte Carlo model for routine patient dose calculation was successfully developed and tested. This model allows users to directly recalculate DICOM RP files containing patients' plans that have been exported from a commercial TPS.

Citing Articles

Monte Carlo modeling of the Elekta Versa HD and patient dose calculation with EGSnrc/BEAMnrc.

Paschal H, Kabat C, Papaconstadopoulos P, Kirby N, Myers P, Wagner T J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022; 23(9):e13715.

PMID: 35985698 PMC: 9512349. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13715.

References

Mail N, Albarakati Y, Ahmad Khan M, Saeedi F, Safadi N, Al-Ghamdi S . The impacts of dental filling materials on RapidArc treatment planning and dose delivery: challenges and solution. Med Phys. 2013; 40(8):081714. DOI: 10.1118/1.4816307. View

Kawrakow I, Rogers D, Walters B . Large efficiency improvements in BEAMnrc using directional bremsstrahlung splitting. Med Phys. 2004; 31(10):2883-98. DOI: 10.1118/1.1788912. View

Parenica H, Mavroidis P, Jones W, Swanson G, Papanikolaou N, Stathakis S . VMAT Optimization and Dose Calculation in the Presence of Metallic Hip Prostheses. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019; 18:1533033819892255. PMC: 6887823. DOI: 10.1177/1533033819892255. View

Low D, Harms W, Mutic S, Purdy J . A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys. 1998; 25(5):656-61. DOI: 10.1118/1.598248. View

Feng Z, Yue H, Zhang Y, Wu H, Cheng J, Su X . Monte Carlo simulation of beam characteristics from small fields based on TrueBeam flattening-filter-free mode. Radiat Oncol. 2016; 11:30. PMC: 4769502. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0601-2. View

Reft C, Alecu R, Das I, Gerbi B, Keall P, Lief E . Dosimetric considerations for patients with HIP prostheses undergoing pelvic irradiation. Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 63. Med Phys. 2003; 30(6):1162-82. DOI: 10.1118/1.1565113. View

Rijken J, Colyer C . Dose uncertainties associated with a set density override of unknown hip prosthetic composition. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017; 18(5):301-306. PMC: 5874959. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12167. View

De Conto C, Gschwind R, Martin E, Makovicka L . Study of dental prostheses influence in radiation therapy. Phys Med. 2013; 30(1):117-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.03.002. View

Onizuka R, Araki F, Ohno T . Monte Carlo dose verification of VMAT treatment plans using Elekta Agility 160-leaf MLC. Phys Med. 2018; 51:22-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.06.003. View

10.

Das I, Francescon P, Moran J, Ahnesjo A, Aspradakis M, Cheng C . Report of AAPM Task Group 155: Megavoltage photon beam dosimetry in small fields and non-equilibrium conditions. Med Phys. 2021; 48(10):e886-e921. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15030. View

11.

Catli S, Tanir G . Experimental and Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse treatment planning system for effects on dose distribution of the hip prostheses. Med Dosim. 2013; 38(3):332-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.03.005. View

12.

Spirydovich S, Papiez L, Langer M, Sandison G, Thai V . High density dental materials and radiotherapy planning: comparison of the dose predictions using superposition algorithm and fluence map Monte Carlo method with radiochromic film measurements. Radiother Oncol. 2006; 81(3):309-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.10.010. View

13.

Zhu T, Stathakis S, Clark J, Feng W, Georg D, Holmes S . Report of AAPM Task Group 219 on independent calculation-based dose/MU verification for IMRT. Med Phys. 2021; 48(10):e808-e829. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15069. View

14.

Spadea M, Verburg J, Baroni G, Seco J . The impact of low-Z and high-Z metal implants in IMRT: a Monte Carlo study of dose inaccuracies in commercial dose algorithms. Med Phys. 2014; 41(1):011702. DOI: 10.1118/1.4829505. View

15.

Sikora M, Dohm O, Alber M . A virtual photon source model of an Elekta linear accelerator with integrated mini MLC for Monte Carlo based IMRT dose calculation. Phys Med Biol. 2007; 52(15):4449-63. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/15/006. View

16.

Mata Colodro F, Serna Berna A, Puchades Puchades V . Dosimetric validation of a redundant independent calculation software for VMAT fields. Phys Med. 2012; 29(4):341-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.05.003. View

17.

Gholampourkashi S, Cygler J, Belec J, Vujicic M, Heath E . Monte Carlo and analytic modeling of an Elekta Infinity linac with Agility MLC: Investigating the significance of accurate model parameters for small radiation fields. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018; 20(1):55-67. PMC: 6333188. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12485. View

18.

Ojala J, Kapanen M, Sipila P, Hyodynmaa S, Pitkanen M . The accuracy of Acuros XB algorithm for radiation beams traversing a metallic hip implant - comparison with measurements and Monte Carlo calculations. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014; 15(5):4912. PMC: 5711096. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4912. View

19.

Parenica H, Ford J, Mavroidis P, Li Y, Papanikolaou N, Stathakis S . Treatment planning dose accuracy improvement in the presence of dental implants. Med Dosim. 2018; 44(2):159-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2018.04.005. View

20.

Bagheri H, Soleimani A, Gharehaghaji N, Mesbahi A, Manouchehri F, Shekarchi B . An overview on small-field dosimetry in photon beam radiotherapy: Developments and challenges. J Cancer Res Ther. 2017; 13(2):175-185. DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.199444. View