» Articles » PMID: 35848371

Gray Matter Volume Differences Between Early Bilinguals and Monolinguals: A Study of Children and Adults

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Jul 18
PMID 35848371
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gray matter has been shown to be greater in early bilingual adults relative to monolingual adults in regions associated with language (Mechelli et al., 2004), and executive control (EC; Olulade et al., 2016). It is not known, however, if language experience-dependent differences in gray matter volume (GMV) exist in children. Further, any such differences are likely not to be the same as those observed in early bilingual adults, as children have had relatively shorter duration of dual-language exposure and/or less development of brain regions serving EC. We tested these predictions by comparing GMV in Spanish-English early bilingual and English monolingual children, and Spanish-English early bilingual and English monolingual adults (n = 122). Comparing only children revealed relatively more GMV in the bilinguals in bilateral frontal, right inferior frontal, and right superior parietal cortices (regions associated with EC). Bilinguals, however, had less GMV in left inferior parietal cortex (region associated with language). An ANOVA including these children with bilingual and monolingual adults revealed interactions of Language Background by Age Group. There were no regions of more GMV in bilinguals relative to monolinguals that were less pronounced in children than adults, despite the children's shorter dual-language experience. There were relative differences between bilingual and monolingual children that were more pronounced than those in adults in left precentral gyrus and right superior parietal lobule (close to, but not directly in areas associated with EC). Together, early bilingual children manifest relative differences in GMV, and, surprisingly, these do not diverge much from those observed in studies of bilingual adults.

Citing Articles

Association of chronotype with language and episodic memory processing in children: implications for brain structure.

Yamashita M, Shou Q, Mizuno Y Front Integr Neurosci. 2024; 18:1437585.

PMID: 39170667 PMC: 11335642. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2024.1437585.


Age of Bilingual Onset Shapes the Dynamics of Functional Connectivity and Laterality in the Resting-State.

Sheng Y, Yang S, Rao J, Zhang Q, Li J, Wang D Brain Sci. 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37759832 PMC: 10526135. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13091231.


Bilingualism and creativity across development: Evidence from divergent thinking and convergent thinking.

Zheng Y, Denervaud S, Durrleman S Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 16:1058803.

PMID: 36684844 PMC: 9859714. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1058803.


Gray matter volume differences between early bilinguals and monolinguals: A study of children and adults.

Schug A, Brignoni-Perez E, Jamal N, Eden G Hum Brain Mapp. 2022; 43(16):4817-4834.

PMID: 35848371 PMC: 9582359. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26008.

References
1.
Sowell E, Thompson P, Leonard C, Welcome S, Kan E, Toga A . Longitudinal mapping of cortical thickness and brain growth in normal children. J Neurosci. 2004; 24(38):8223-31. PMC: 6729679. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1798-04.2004. View

2.
Schug A, Brignoni-Perez E, Jamal N, Eden G . Gray matter volume differences between early bilinguals and monolinguals: A study of children and adults. Hum Brain Mapp. 2022; 43(16):4817-4834. PMC: 9582359. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26008. View

3.
Hilchey M, Klein R . Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011; 18(4):625-58. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0116-7. View

4.
Weikum W, Vouloumanos A, Navarra J, Soto-Faraco S, Sebastian-Galles N, Werker J . Visual language discrimination in infancy. Science. 2007; 316(5828):1159. DOI: 10.1126/science.1137686. View

5.
Bialystok E, Craik F, Luk G . Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012; 16(4):240-50. PMC: 3322418. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001. View