» Articles » PMID: 24073327

Bilingualism is Not a Categorical Variable: Interaction Between Language Proficiency and Usage

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2013 Sep 28
PMID 24073327
Citations 153
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bilingual experience is dynamic and poses a challenge for researchers to develop instruments that capture its relevant dimensions. The present study examined responses from a questionnaire administered to 110 heterogeneous bilingual young adults. These questions concern participants' language use, acquisition history and self-reported proficiency. The questionnaire responses and performances on standardized English proficiency measures were analyzed using factor analysis. In order to retain a realistic representation of bilingual experience, the factors were allowed to correlate with each other in the analysis. Two correlating factors were extracted, representing daily bilingual usage and English proficiency. These two factors were also related to self-rated proficiency in English and non-English language. Results were interpreted as supporting the notion that bilingual experience is composed of multiple related dimensions that will need to be considered in assessments of the consequences of bilingualism.

Citing Articles

Predicting language dominance in Spanish/English bilingual adults based on relative speech-in-speech recognition scores.

Cowan T, Calandruccio L, Buss E, Rodriguez B, Leibold L Int J Billing. 2024; 28(5):845-862.

PMID: 39574932 PMC: 11580830. DOI: 10.1177/13670069231195394.


Effects of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Bilingual Logopenic Primary Progressive Aphasia.

Coemans S, de Aguiar V, Paquier P, Tsapkini K, Engelborghs S, Struys E J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2024; 8(1):1253-1273.

PMID: 39434819 PMC: 11491977. DOI: 10.3233/ADR-240034.


Modeling individual differences in vocabulary development: A large-scale study on Japanese heritage speakers.

Kubota M, Rothman J Child Dev. 2024; 96(1):325-340.

PMID: 39342633 PMC: 11693831. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.14168.


Negative Pragmatic Transfer in Bilinguals: Cross-Linguistic Influence in the Acquisition of Quantifiers.

Mazzaggio G, Stateva P J Psycholinguist Res. 2024; 53(5):67.

PMID: 39162851 PMC: 11335837. DOI: 10.1007/s10936-024-10101-9.


Distinct functional connectivity patterns during naturalistic learning by adolescent first versus second language speakers.

Guerrero S, Mesite L, Luk G Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):18984.

PMID: 39152202 PMC: 11329752. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69575-1.


References
1.
Liu H, Hu Z, Guo T, Peng D . Speaking words in two languages with one brain: neural overlap and dissociation. Brain Res. 2009; 1316:75-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.030. View

2.
Bialystok E, Craik F, Luk G . Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008; 34(4):859-73. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.859. View

3.
Gollan T, Acenas L . What is a TOT? Cognate and translation effects on tip-of-the-tongue states in Spanish-English and tagalog-English bilinguals. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004; 30(1):246-69. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.246. View

4.
Li P, Sepanski S, Zhao X . Language history questionnaire: A web-based interface for bilingual research. Behav Res Methods. 2006; 38(2):202-10. DOI: 10.3758/bf03192770. View

5.
Chee M, Soon C, Lee H, Pallier C . Left insula activation: a marker for language attainment in bilinguals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(42):15265-70. PMC: 523445. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0403703101. View