» Articles » PMID: 35522694

Spatial Dynamics of Feedback and Feedforward Regulation in Cell Lineages

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 May 6
PMID 35522694
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Feedback mechanisms within cell lineages are thought to be important for maintaining tissue homeostasis. Mathematical models that assume well-mixed cell populations, together with experimental data, have suggested that negative feedback from differentiated cells on the stem cell self-renewal probability can maintain a stable equilibrium and hence homeostasis. Cell lineage dynamics, however, are characterized by spatial structure, which can lead to different properties. Here, we investigate these dynamics using spatially explicit computational models, including cell division, differentiation, death, and migration / diffusion processes. According to these models, the negative feedback loop on stem cell self-renewal fails to maintain homeostasis, both under the assumption of strong spatial restrictions and fast migration / diffusion. Although homeostasis cannot be maintained, this feedback can regulate cell density and promote the formation of spatial structures in the model. Tissue homeostasis, however, can be achieved if spatially restricted negative feedback on self-renewal is combined with an experimentally documented spatial feedforward loop, in which stem cells regulate the fate of transit amplifying cells. This indicates that the dynamics of feedback regulation in tissue cell lineages are more complex than previously thought, and that combinations of spatially explicit control mechanisms are likely instrumental.

Citing Articles

Insight into the Potential of Somatostatin Vaccination with Goats as a Model: From a Perspective of the Gastrointestinal Microbiota.

Zhang X, Chen J, Zhang S, Wei B, Han Y, Zhao Z Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40076011 PMC: 11899232. DOI: 10.3390/ani15050728.


Dynamically adjusted cell fate decisions and resilience to mutant invasion during steady-state hematopoiesis revealed by an experimentally parameterized mathematical model.

Komarova N, Rignot C, Fleischman A, Wodarz D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(38):e2321525121.

PMID: 39250660 PMC: 11420203. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2321525121.


Aging effects on osteoclast progenitor dynamics affect variability in bone turnover via feedback regulation.

Kim Y, Kameo Y, Tanaka S, Adachi T JBMR Plus. 2024; 8(1):ziad003.

PMID: 38690125 PMC: 11059999. DOI: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziad003.

References
1.
Drabsch Y, Ten Dijke P . TGF-β signalling and its role in cancer progression and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2012; 31(3-4):553-68. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-012-9375-7. View

2.
Lo W, Chou C, Gokoffski K, Wan F, Lander A, Calof A . Feedback regulation in multistage cell lineages. Math Biosci Eng. 2009; 6(1):59-82. PMC: 2756546. DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.59. View

3.
Neuzillet C, Tijeras-Raballand A, Cohen R, Cros J, Faivre S, Raymond E . Targeting the TGFβ pathway for cancer therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 2014; 147:22-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.11.001. View

4.
Lim D, Tramontin A, Trevejo J, Herrera D, Garcia-Verdugo J, Alvarez-Buylla A . Noggin antagonizes BMP signaling to create a niche for adult neurogenesis. Neuron. 2001; 28(3):713-26. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00148-3. View

5.
Nicolas P, Kim K, Shibata D, Tavare S . The stem cell population of the human colon crypt: analysis via methylation patterns. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007; 3(3):e28. PMC: 1808490. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030028. View