» Articles » PMID: 21081061

Spatial Dynamics of Multistage Cell Lineages in Tissue Stratification

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2010 Nov 18
PMID 21081061
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In developing and self-renewing tissues, terminally differentiated (TD) cell types are typically specified through the actions of multistage cell lineages. Such lineages commonly include a stem cell and multiple progenitor (transit-amplifying) cell stages, which ultimately give rise to TD cells. As the tissue reaches a tightly controlled steady-state size, cells at different lineage stages assume distinct spatial locations within the tissue. Although tissue stratification appears to be genetically specified, the underlying mechanisms that direct tissue lamination are not yet completely understood. Herein, we use modeling and simulations to explore several potential mechanisms that can be utilized to create stratification during developmental or regenerative growth in general systems and in the model system, the olfactory epithelium of mouse. Our results show that tissue stratification can be generated and maintained through controlling spatial distribution of diffusive signaling molecules that regulate the proliferation of each cell type within the lineage. The ability of feedback molecules to stratify a tissue is dependent on a low TD death rate: high death rates decrease tissue lamination. Regulation of the cell cycle lengths of stem cells by feedback signals can lead to transient accumulation of stem cells near the base and apex of tissue.

Citing Articles

Migration and proliferation drive the emergence of patterns in co-cultures of differentiating vascular progenitor cells.

Zamora Alvarado J, McCloskey K, Gopinathan A Math Biosci Eng. 2024; 21(8):6731-6757.

PMID: 39483091 PMC: 11556463. DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2024295.


A multiscale chemical-mechanical model predicts impact of morphogen spreading on tissue growth.

Ramezani A, Britton S, Zandi R, Alber M, Nematbakhsh A, Chen W NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2023; 9(1):16.

PMID: 37210381 PMC: 10199952. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-023-00278-5.


Spatial dynamics of feedback and feedforward regulation in cell lineages.

Uhl P, Lowengrub J, Komarova N, Wodarz D PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18(5):e1010039.

PMID: 35522694 PMC: 9116666. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010039.


Regulatory feedback effects on tissue growth dynamics in a two-stage cell lineage model.

Wang M, Lander A, Lai P Phys Rev E. 2021; 104(3-1):034405.

PMID: 34654185 PMC: 8585573. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.034405.


Multiple morphogens and rapid elongation promote segmental patterning during development.

Qiu Y, Fung L, Schilling T, Nie Q PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(6):e1009077.

PMID: 34161317 PMC: 8259987. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009077.


References
1.
Schneyer A, Sidis Y, Gulati A, Sun J, Keutmann H, Krasney P . Differential antagonism of activin, myostatin and growth and differentiation factor 11 by wild-type and mutant follistatin. Endocrinology. 2008; 149(9):4589-95. PMC: 2553374. DOI: 10.1210/en.2008-0259. View

2.
Reeves G, Fraser S . Biological systems from an engineer's point of view. PLoS Biol. 2009; 7(1):e21. PMC: 2628404. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000021. View

3.
Schwartz Levey M, Chikaraishi D, Kauer J . Characterization of potential precursor populations in the mouse olfactory epithelium using immunocytochemistry and autoradiography. J Neurosci. 1991; 11(11):3556-64. PMC: 6575532. View

4.
DArcangelo G . Reelin mouse mutants as models of cortical development disorders. Epilepsy Behav. 2005; 8(1):81-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.09.005. View

5.
Schneyer A, Schoen A, Quigg A, Sidis Y . Differential binding and neutralization of activins A and B by follistatin and follistatin like-3 (FSTL-3/FSRP/FLRG). Endocrinology. 2003; 144(5):1671-4. DOI: 10.1210/en.2002-0203. View